Louisiana House Bill HCR22

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/20
• Refer: 3/16/20

Caption

Urges and requests the Public Service Commission to temporarily prohibit energy and water companies from disconnecting services

Impact

If enacted, HCR22 would directly impact state regulations pertaining to utility services, particularly in the realm of customer protections. This resolution emphasizes public safety and seeks to ensure that vulnerable populations can maintain access to essential services, such as electricity and water, without the fear of disconnection. Furthermore, by aligning with similar actions taken in other states, it positions Louisiana to support its residents during a prolonged public health crisis which poses unique economic challenges.

Summary

HCR22 urges the Public Service Commission of Louisiana to prohibit energy and water companies from disconnecting services due to nonpayment for a period of three months in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The resolution arose from the recognition that many residents faced significant economic difficulties as a result of the pandemic, which jeopardized their ability to pay for essential utilities. By proposing a temporary hold on service terminations, the bill aims to alleviate financial stress and prioritize public health and safety during this critical time.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR22 is largely supportive among individuals concerned for public welfare, particularly those acknowledging the hardships faced by low-income families during the pandemic. Many legislators and community organizations believe that ensuring access to utilities is vital for health and safety. However, there are also concerns voiced regarding the implications for utility companies and the financial strain on their operations caused by extended disconnection prohibitions, indicating some opposition among stakeholders focused on economic impacts.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around balancing public health needs with the operational realities of utility companies. While proponents advocate for immediate protections for residents, critics express worries that such measures could lead to financial challenges for the utilities themselves. There is also ongoing debate about the timeline; some legislators argue for a shorter or more conditional suspension based on specific metrics related to economic recovery or health indicators, highlighting differing views on how best to approach public health amid an economic crisis.