Suspends laws regarding legal deadlines, including prescription and preemption
The resolution's implementation suspends prescriptive and peremptive periods affecting court activities, such as the initiation, continuation, prosecution, defense, and appeal of cases in state and municipal courts. This measure intends to alleviate the burden on the judicial system during the ongoing pandemic by delaying legal timelines and allowing for greater flexibility in managing court duties and responsibilities. As a result, this temporary alteration of the legal framework is anticipated to provide relief to individuals and legal entities compelled to navigate complex legal systems under the strain of the public health crisis.
HCR23, introduced during the 2020 Regular Session, is a house concurrent resolution that seeks to suspend certain legal deadlines across various statutes in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. This resolution addresses provisions in the Louisiana Civil Code, the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, and other titles within the Louisiana Revised Statutes which establish deadlines for legal proceedings. Specifically, HCR23 aims to ensure that citizens do not face the pressures of legal deadlines during a time when public health challenges hinder court availability and access to justice.
The sentiment around HCR23 is generally supportive, as it addresses an urgent public need by ensuring access to justice during an unprecedented health crisis. Many legislators recognize the necessity of adapting legal proceedings to accommodate the complications caused by COVID-19, viewing the suspension of deadlines as a crucial protective measure for citizens involved in ongoing legal matters. However, the resolution may also raise concerns among legal practitioners about potential disruptions and uncertainties in trial preparations and judicial processes.
While HCR23 is positioned as a necessary response to the pandemic, there are points of contention regarding the implications of such a suspension. Critics may argue that extending legal deadlines could undermine accountability and delay justice for those awaiting trial or resolution of their legal challenges. Furthermore, there is an inherent tension between ensuring equitable access to the justice system and the potential ramifications of prolonged legal proceedings on the rights of defendants and plaintiffs alike. Thus, the resolution invokes complex legal and ethical discussions about the balance between public health and the administration of justice.