Louisiana 2020 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB153 Introduced / Bill

                    SLS 20RS-43	ORIGINAL
2020 Regular Session
SENATE BILL NO. 153
BY SENATOR FOIL 
TUTORSHIP.  Provides relative to continuing tutorship. (8/1/20)
1	AN ACT
2 To amend and reenact Civil Code Articles 355 and 356, relative to continuing tutorship; to
3 provide for the filing of a petition; to provide for the appointment of tutors; to
4 provide for the appointment of co-tutors; and to provide for related matters.
5 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
6 Section 1.  Civil Code Articles 355 and 356 are hereby amended and reenacted to
7 read as follows:
8 Art. 355. Petition for continuing or permanent tutorship
9	When a person above the age of fifteen possesses less than two-thirds of the
10 intellectual functioning of a person of the same age with average intellectual
11 functioning, evidenced by standard testing procedures administered by competent
12 persons or other relevant evidence acceptable to the court, the parents of such person,
13 or the person entitled to custody or tutorship if one or both parents are dead,
14 incapacitated, or an absent person or absent persons, or if the parents are judicially
15 separated or divorced or have never been married to each other, may, with the
16 written concurrence of the coroner of the parish of the intellectually disabled person's
17 domicile, petition the court of that district to place such person under a continuing
Page 1 of 4
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 153
SLS 20RS-43	ORIGINAL
1 tutorship which shall not automatically end at any age but shall continue until
2 revoked by the court of domicile. The petitioner shall not bear the coroner's costs or
3 fees associated with securing the coroner's concurrence.
4 Art. 356.  Title of proceedings; procedural rules; parents as tutor and undertutor
5	parent to be named tutor
6	The title of the proceedings shall be Continuing Tutorship of (Name of
7 Person), A Person with an Intellectual Disability.
8	(1)  When the person to be placed under the continuing tutorship is above the
9 age of fifteen, and under the age of majority, the proceeding shall be conducted
10 according to the procedural rules established for ordinary tutorships.
11	(2)  When the person to be placed under the continuing tutorship is above the
12 age of majority, the proceeding shall be conducted according to the procedural rules
13 established for interdictions.
14	(3)  Upon the petition of both When the parents of the mentally deficient
15 person during their marriage one parent shall be named as tutor and the other as
16 undertutor to be placed under the continuing tutorship are married to each other
17 and petition jointly, the court shall appoint the parents as co-tutors, unless for
18 good reasons the judge good cause the court decrees otherwise.
19	(4) When the parents of the person to be placed under the continuing
20 tutorship are married to each other but do not petition jointly, the court shall
21 appoint either a petitioning parent as tutor or both individually petitioning
22 parents as co-tutors, in accordance with the best interest of the child.
23	(5) Upon the petition of a parent of the person to be placed under the
24 continuing tutorship, the court shall, unless good cause requires otherwise,
25 appoint as tutor the petitioning parent who is:
26	(a) The surviving parent, if one parent is dead.
27	(b) The parent awarded custody during minority of the person to be
28 placed under the continuing tutorship, if the parents are divorced or judicially
29 separated.
Page 2 of 4
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 153
SLS 20RS-43	ORIGINAL
1	(c) The parent who was tutor or tutrix during minority, if the parents
2 were never married to each other.
3	Revision Comments - 2020
4	(a) Subparagraph (5) incorporates Louisiana's child custody rules. See, e.g.,
5 Articles 131 through 135. Although there are no provisions of law addressing
6 custody of an adult descendant, for the purposes of this Article, the custodial
7 determination made during minority informs the naming of a tutor for a major placed
8 under continuing tutorship.
9	(b) See also Article 273 (requiring an undertutor in all cases). It may be
10 appropriate for the court to name one parent tutor and the other undertutor under this
11 Article.
12	(c) Under Subparagraph (5)(b), a parent with sole custody who petitions may
13 be named tutor of the person to be placed under continuing tutorship. Likewise,
14 parents with joint custody may be named co-tutors if each petitions. The rule
15 established here is intended to approximate that applicable to tutorship during
16 minority. See, e.g., Article 250 (making parents joint custody co-tutors unless
17 otherwise ordered by the court).
The original instrument and the following digest, which constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument, were prepared by Xavier I. Alexander.
DIGEST
SB 153 Original 2020 Regular Session	Foil
Present law (C.C. Art. 355) authorizes the parents or legal custodians of a person with
intellectual disabilities to petition for continuing tutorship.
Proposed law retains present law and authorizes parents who have never been married to
each other to petition for continuing tutorship.
Present law (C.C. Art. 356) requires the court to name one parent as tutor and the other
parent as undertutor.
Proposed law changes present law to allow the court to name parents as co-tutors when they
petition jointly or when it is in the best interest of the child.
Proposed law also provides for the naming of a tutor when one parent is dead, when the
parents are divorced or judicially separated, and when the parents were never married to
each other.
Page 3 of 4
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 153
SLS 20RS-43	ORIGINAL
Effective August 1, 2020.
(Amends C.C. Arts. 355 and 356)
Page 4 of 4
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions.