Louisiana Senate Bill SB358

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/20
• Refer: 2/28/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

Provides for revisions to the fee structure and oversight of the in-service training and educational programs for state employees by the Department of State Civil Service. (8/1/20) (OR NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The bill is positioned to have a transformative impact on how employee training programs are managed and funded. By changing the fee determination process, the Department of State Civil Service is expected to increase efficiency in billing and collections while potentially lowering the costs associated with these training programs for state entities. The new structure could lead to increased participation in training sessions, ultimately enhancing the skill levels of state employees and contributing to improved public service delivery.

Summary

Senate Bill 358 revises the oversight and fee structure for in-service training and educational programs provided by the Department of State Civil Service in Louisiana. The bill abolishes the previous policy board that determined fees and establishes that fees will be set by the Department internally. This change aims to streamline the fee assessment process for training services provided to state employees and public officials, making these services more accessible while ensuring that they meet the necessary standards of quality and effectiveness.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 358 appears largely supportive among those who recognize the necessity of updating the state’s training systems. Proponents emphasize the need for better-managed training programs that can adapt to changing demands within the workforce. However, there are concerns about the potential for reduced oversight without the policy board, leading to questions about transparency in the setting and adjustment of fees, which may lead to a mix of support and skepticism among stakeholders.

Contention

One notable point of contention arises from the removal of the policy board, which some legislators and stakeholders fear might diminish the collective input from multiple perspectives in determining training quality and cost. Critics argue that this could centralize too much authority within the Department of State Civil Service, raising concerns over transparency and accountability, especially regarding fee adjustments and access to training programs. Thus, while the bill is aimed at efficiency, it opens discussions about the balance between oversight and the need for a streamlined training program.