Louisiana Senate Bill SB516

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/7/20
• Refer: 5/12/20

Caption

Provides for promotional play wagers. (gov sig) (EG -$29,300,000 RV See Note)

Impact

The implications of SB 516 could be considerable for gaming operations within Louisiana. By excluding promotional play wagers from the determination of net gaming proceeds and gross revenue, the bill effectively alters how gaming revenue is calculated. This policy change may lead to lower reported revenues for casinos, which could subsequently affect state tax collections and financial planning related to gaming oversight. Operators may argue that this bill allows for a more accurate reflection of operational profitability, while critics might express concerns over potential revenue losses for the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 516 aims to amend existing laws related to gaming in Louisiana by providing specific definitions and exclusions for 'promotional play wagers'. Currently, the laws define terms such as 'net gaming proceeds' and 'gross revenue' for riverboat gaming and land-based casinos. The bill seeks to clarify that promotional play wagers are to be excluded from the calculations of these financial terms, thereby adjusting how revenue is reported for tax and regulatory purposes. This adjustment is significant as it could impact the overall financial accountability of gaming operators in the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill reflects a mixture of support and concern. Proponents of the bill, likely from within the gaming industry, argue that excluding promotional wagers aligns state definitions with actual business practices and helps to promote fair competition. Conversely, there are apprehensions, particularly from policymakers focused on state revenue, that this exclusion could lead to decreased tax revenues for the state—a point of contention as debates continue on balancing the interests of business operators and state fiscal health.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential long-term effects on state finances and the integrity of gaming revenue reporting. Opponents of SB 516 may raise alarms about the precedent it sets for future exclusions of revenue sources in the gaming industry, allowing operators to diminish taxable amounts artificially. Stakeholders in state governance underscore the importance of maintaining a robust revenue system against the backdrop of an industry known for its volatility and economic impacts.