Louisiana Senate Bill SCR69

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/21/20
• Refer: 5/22/20
• Passed: 5/22/20
• Engrossed: 5/22/20
• Refer: 5/26/20

Caption

Establishes the One Call Agricultural Study Group.

Impact

SCR69's implementation is expected to facilitate a thorough analysis of how existing regulations affect agricultural practices in Louisiana. The study group, comprising representatives from various agricultural and conservation organizations, will make recommendations on potential changes to state laws. The resolution mandates that the committee provide a comprehensive report by February 1, 2021, which will be instrumental in guiding lawmakers on whether agricultural-specific exemptions are warranted within the damage prevention law.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 69 (SCR69) establishes the One Call Agricultural Study Group in Louisiana, aimed at reviewing and studying the state's Underground Utilities and Facilities Damage Prevention Law as it pertains specifically to the agricultural sector. This resolution is motivated by the fact that agricultural operators are not granted exemptions under the existing law, unlike similar statutes in neighboring states. The established study group is tasked with evaluating the impact of these laws on agriculture and considering whether amendments are necessary to provide exemptions for agricultural activities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SCR69 appears to be positive, particularly among stakeholders in the agricultural sector who feel that the current laws do not adequately address their operational realities. By emphasizing a review of existing regulations, supporters believe this study group will highlight the unique needs of farmers and agricultural workers, potentially leading to legislative changes that support industry sustainability and productivity. However, there may be concerns among regulatory bodies regarding how exemptions could affect infrastructure and safety standards.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise around the balance between agricultural needs and the broader implications of modifying utility damage prevention laws. While proponents of SCR69 advocate for exemptions that could relieve restrictions on agricultural operators, opponents may argue that such changes should not come at the expense of safety and public welfare associated with underground utility management. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the study group's recommendations could provoke debate about how best to modernize regulations while still fulfilling the law's protective intentions.