Louisiana 2021 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB20 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    RÉSUMÉ DIGEST
HB 20	2021 Regular Session	Miguez
Present law provides relative to payment of costs related to conducting elections, including
payment of costs of ballots and election materials, of publication of the location of polling
places, of renting polling places, of drayage, of setting up voting machines, of compensating
commissioners and deputy parish custodians, of transmitting election returns, and of other
election-related costs incurred by registrars of voters, clerks of court, the secretary of state,
and the parish board of election supervisors.  Present law further specifies that election
expenses are shared on a prorated basis by the state and local governments from funds
appropriated to the secretary of state for that purpose.
Proposed law would have provided that no state or local official or agency responsible for
conducting elections could solicit, accept, use, or dispose of any donation from individuals
or corporations for the purpose of paying costs related to conducting elections.  Proposed law
would have provided that the prohibition did not apply to campaign contributions, to  the
donation of private property for use as a polling place, or to the donation or use of equipment
for the restoration and maintenance of utilities to a precinct or polling place in the event of
an outage.
(Proposed to add R.S. 18:1400.10)
VETO MESSAGE:  In addition to the reasons discussed in my veto of this same bill last
year, there are a few additional reasons for my veto this year.  First, this version is more
expansive than the bill last year which provided for limitations only on elections conducted
during an emergency.  The bill this year, inexplicably, expands this to all elections. 
Secondly, like the bill last year, this legislation would prevent all forms of donations, no
matter how good the intentions, to local elections officials.  Thus, while in committee there
was overheated rhetoric about the motivations of social media companies trying to influence
elections, this bill would also likely prevent the local VFW from providing donuts for
election workers on election day.  Lastly, and ironically, the Legislative appropriations bill,
House Bill 695, passed without a single vote in opposition, provides that the "legislature is
hereby expressly authorized to receive and expend any monies received as a result of any
grants or donations or other forms of assistance as provided for in Article VII, Section
9(A)(1) of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974."  Thus, the Legislature is reserving for itself
the ability to receive and spend grants and donations while attempting to outlaw the same for
other public bodies.  The author made no effort to eliminate this provision from House Bill
695 nor to explain why the Legislature is somehow immune from the improper influence of
grants and donations that he fears would end up corrupting local election officials.