Louisiana House Bill HB300

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/21
• Refer: 3/30/21
• Refer: 4/12/21

Caption

Eliminates the mandatory decrease in the amount of earned income tax credit

Impact

This bill is significant as it directly affects the financial aid available to lower-income taxpayers in Louisiana. Keeping the EITC at 5% rather than allowing it to drop to 3.5% ensures that eligible residents will continue to receive a more substantial tax benefit each year. This move is viewed as a strategy to combat poverty and provide financial assistance to a demographic that may otherwise struggle without these benefits. By maintaining the current percentage, the state reinforces its commitment to supporting lower-income families and assists with their overall economic well-being.

Summary

House Bill 300, introduced by Representative James, aims to amend the individual income tax credits in Louisiana by eliminating the scheduled decrease of the earned income tax credit (EITC) set to take effect in 2026. Currently, the EITC is structured to provide citizens with a tax credit that is 5% of their federal earned income tax credit for the years up to 2025. HB300 proposes to make this 5% credit permanent, preventing the decrease to 3.5% in 2026. This change is expected to provide sustained financial support to low-income individuals and families who qualify for the federal EITC, enhancing their economic stability.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB300 appears to be predominantly positive among proponents who view it as an essential measure for continued financial relief for low-income citizens. Supporters argue that maintaining the higher rate of the earned income tax credit will help families make ends meet and encourage work by supplementing incomes. However, there may be some concerns regarding potential state budget implications, as more substantial tax credits may impact overall tax revenue.

Contention

While there is general support for HB300, contention could arise from discussions about fiscal responsibility and the impact on the state's budget. Detractors may argue that preserving the higher tax credit could lead to reduced funds available for other essential services and programs. Critics may also question whether these tax credits effectively lead to the intended economic benefits for residents or whether alternative measures could yield better outcomes. The debate will likely center around the balance between providing necessary support for low-income individuals and maintaining a responsible fiscal approach.