HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
2021 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 39
BY REPRESENTATIVE MAGEE
(On Recommendation of the Louisiana State Law Institute)
Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana.
CIVIL/PROCEDURE: Provides relative to the recusal of judges
1 AN ACT
2To amend and reenact Chapter 3 of Title I of Book I of the Code of Civil Procedure, to be
3 comprised of Code of Civil Procedure Articles 151 through 159, the heading of
4 Chapter 3 of Title I of Book VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, the heading of
5 Code of Civil Procedure Article 4861 and Code of Civil Procedure Articles 4862,
6 4863, and 4864, the heading of Code of Civil Procedure Article 4865, and Code of
7 Civil Procedure Article 4866, relative to the recusal of judges; to provide for the
8 grounds for recusal; to provide for disclosures required of judges; to provide for
9 recusal on the court's own motion; to provide for the procedure for recusal; to
10 provide for the selection of the judge to try the motion to recuse; to provide for the
11 selection of the judge after recusal; to provide for the motion to recuse; to provide
12 for the appointment of judge ad hoc; and to provide for related matters.
13Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
14 Section 1. Chapter 3 of Title I of Book I of the Code of Civil Procedure, to be
15comprised of Code of Civil Procedure Articles 151 through 159, the heading of Chapter 3
16of Title I of Book VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, the heading of Code of Civil
17Procedure Article 4861 and Code of Civil Procedure Articles 4862, 4863, and 4864, the
18heading of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure Article 4866 are hereby amended and reenacted
19to read as follows:
Page 1 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 CHAPTER 3. RECUSATION RECUSAL OF JUDGES
2 Art. 151. Grounds
3 A. A judge of any trial or appellate court, trial or appellate, shall be recused
4 when he upon any of the following grounds:
5 (1) Is The judge is a witness in the cause;.
6 (2) Has The judge has been employed or consulted as an attorney in the
7 cause or has previously been associated with an attorney during the latter's
8 employment in the cause, and the judge participated in representation in the cause;.
9 (3) Is The judge is the spouse of a party, or of an attorney employed in the
10 cause or the judge's parent, child, or immediate family member is a party or attorney
11 employed in the cause; or.
12 (4) Is The judge is biased, prejudiced, or interested in the cause or its
13 outcome or biased or prejudiced toward or against the parties or the parties' attorneys
14 or any witness to such an extent that he the judge would be unable to conduct fair
15 and impartial proceedings.
16 B. A judge of any court, trial or appellate, may be recused when he:
17 (1) Has been associated with an attorney during the latter's employment in
18 the cause;
19 (2) At the time of the hearing of any contested issue in the cause, has
20 continued to employ, to represent him personally, the attorney actually handling the
21 cause (not just a member of that attorney's firm), and in this case the employment
22 shall be disclosed to each party in the cause;
23 (3) Has performed a judicial act in the cause in another court; or
24 (4) Is related to: a party or the spouse of a party, within the fourth degree;
25 an attorney employed in the cause or the spouse of the attorney, within the second
26 degree; or if the judge's spouse, parent, child, or immediate family member living in
27 the judge's household has a substantial economic interest in the subject matter in
28 controversy sufficient to prevent the judge from conducting fair and impartial
29 proceedings in the cause.
Page 2 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 A judge of any trial or appellate court shall also be recused when there exists
2 a substantial and objective basis that would reasonably be expected to prevent the
3 judge from conducting any aspect of the cause in a fair and impartial manner.
4 C. In any cause in which the state, or a political subdivision thereof, or a
5 religious body or corporation is interested, the fact that the judge is a citizen of the
6 state or a resident of the political subdivision, or pays taxes thereto, or is a member
7 of the religious body or corporation, is not a ground for recusation recusal. In any
8 cause in which a religious body or religious corporation is interested, the fact that the
9 judge is a member of the religious body or religious corporation is not alone a
10 ground for recusal.
11 Comments - 2021
12 (a) Former Paragraph B of this Article, which set forth permissive grounds
13 for recusal, has been deleted, and its substance has been moved to a new provision,
14 Article 152, which provides for the mandatory disclosures that a judge must make
15 to all parties and attorneys in the cause.
16 (b) A new Paragraph B has been added to provide an additional mandatory
17 ground for recusal when a substantial and objective basis exists that would
18 reasonably be expected to prevent the judge from conducting any aspect of the cause
19 in a fair and impartial manner. This provision is intended to serve as a catch-all
20 supplementing the mandatory grounds for recusal set forth in Paragraph A and to
21 incorporate a clearer, more objective standard than the language of Canon 3C of the
22 Code of Judicial Conduct, which provides that a judge should recuse himself when
23 "the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned."
24 (c) This Article and Article 153(B) are intended to set forth the exclusive
25 grounds for the recusal of a judge in a civil proceeding.
26 Art. 152. Disclosures
27 A. A judge of any trial or appellate court shall disclose, to the best of his
28 information and belief, the existence of any of the following to all attorneys and
29 unrepresented parties in the cause:
30 (1) The judge has been associated with an attorney during the latter's
31 employment in the cause.
32 (2) At the time of the hearing of any contested issue in the cause, the judge
33 has continued to employ, to represent him personally, the attorney actually handling
34 the cause or a member of that attorney's firm.
35 (3) The judge performed a judicial act in the cause in another court.
Page 3 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 (4) The judge is related to a party or the spouse of a party, within the fourth
2 degree, or an attorney employed in the cause or the spouse of the attorney, within the
3 second degree.
4 (5) The judge's spouse, parent, child, or immediate family member has a
5 substantial economic interest in the subject matter in controversy.
6 B. Upon disclosure, any party may file a motion that sets forth a ground for
7 recusal under Article 151.
8 Comments - 2021
9 (a) This Article is new, but its substance is taken from former Paragraph B
10 of Article 151, which previously set forth permissive grounds for recusal. The
11 information listed in Paragraph A is now required to be disclosed by the judge to all
12 attorneys and unrepresented parties in the cause. If the information disclosed gives
13 rise to a ground for recusal under Article 151, any party may file a motion to recuse
14 the judge pursuant to the procedure set forth in Article 154.
15 (b) Under Paragraph (A)(4), the judge must disclose whether he is related to
16 an attorney or the spouse of an attorney within the second degree, which includes the
17 judge's children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, and siblings. The judge must
18 also disclose whether he is related to a party or the spouse of a party within the
19 fourth degree, which includes the family members previously listed as well as the
20 judge's nieces and nephews, aunts and uncles, first cousins, great-grandchildren,
21 great-grandparents, and great-aunts and uncles, among others. For an explanation
22 of how to determine the degree of relationship between the judge and an attorney or
23 party and their spouses, see Civil Code Articles 900 and 901.
24 (c) Paragraph (A)(5) of this Article was taken from former Article 151(B)(4)
25 and requires the judge to disclose if his spouse, parent, child, or immediate family
26 member has a substantial economic interest in the subject matter in controversy.
27 Such disclosure must be made in all cases regardless of whether the judge's
28 immediate family member is "living in the judge's household," as was provided
29 under former Article 151(B)(4).
30 (d) This Article's requirement that a judge of any "trial" court make certain
31 disclosures to all parties and attorneys in the cause applies not only to district court
32 judges, but also to parish and city court judges as well as justices of the peace.
33 Art. 152 153. Recusation Recusal on court's own motion or by supreme court
34 A. A judge may recuse himself in any cause in which a ground for recusal
35 exists, whether or not a motion for his recusation recusal has been filed by a party
36 or not, in any cause in which a ground for recusation exists.
37 B. A district judge may recuse himself in any cause objecting to the
38 candidacy or contesting the election for any office in which the district or jurisdiction
Page 4 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 of such office lies wholly within the judicial district from of the court on which the
2 district judge is elected serves.
3 C. On the written application of a district judge, the supreme court may
4 recuse him for any reason which it considers sufficient. Prior to the cause being
5 allotted to another judge, a judge who recuses himself for any reason shall
6 contemporaneously file in the record the order of recusal and written responses that
7 provide the factual basis for recusal under Article 151. The judge shall also provide
8 a copy of the recusal and the written reasons therefor to the judicial administrator of
9 the supreme court.
10 D. If a judge recuses himself pursuant to this Article, he shall provide in
11 writing the specific grounds under Article 151 for which the recusal is ordered within
12 fifteen days of the rendering of the order of recusal.
13 Comments - 2021
14 Paragraph C of this Article is new and requires the judge to file written
15 reasons containing the factual basis for the judge's self-recusal prior to the cause
16 being allotted to another judge. This provision also requires the judge to provide a
17 copy of both the recusal and the written reasons for the recusal to the judicial
18 administrator of the supreme court. This reporting requirement reflects the
19 countervailing considerations of a judge's duty to sit and his obligation to recuse
20 when a valid ground for recusal exists. A judge is "not at liberty, nor does he have
21 the right, to take himself out of a case and burden another judge with his
22 responsibility without good and legal cause." In re Lemoine, 686 So. 2d 837 (La.
23 1997).
24 Art. 153. Judge may act until recused or motion for recusation filed
25 Until a judge has recused himself, or a motion for his recusation has been
26 filed, he has full power and authority to act in the cause. The judge to whom the
27 motion to recuse is assigned shall have full power and authority to act in the cause
28 pending the disposition of the motion to recuse.
29 Art. 154. Procedure for recusation recusal of district court judge
30 A. A party desiring to recuse a judge of a district court shall file a written
31 motion therefor assigning the ground for recusation recusal under Article 151. This
32 motion shall be filed prior to trial or hearing unless the party discovers the facts
33 constituting the ground for recusation thereafter, in which event it shall be filed
34 immediately after these facts are discovered, but prior to judgment no later than
Page 5 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 thirty days after discovery of the facts constituting the ground upon which the motion
2 is based, but in all cases prior to the scheduling of the matter for trial. In the event
3 that the facts constituting the ground upon which the motion to recuse is based occur
4 after the matter is scheduled for trial or the party moving for recusal could not, in the
5 exercise of due diligence, have discovered such facts, the motion to recuse shall be
6 filed immediately after such facts occur or are discovered.
7 B. If a valid ground for recusation is set forth in the motion to recuse sets
8 forth a ground for recusal under Article 151, the judge shall either recuse himself,
9 or refer the motion to another judge or a judge make a written request to the supreme
10 court for the appointment of an ad hoc judge, as provided in Articles Article 155 and
11 156, for a hearing.
12 C. If the motion to recuse is not timely filed in accordance with Paragraph
13 A of this Article or fails to set forth a ground for recusal under Article 151, the judge
14 may deny the motion without the appointment of an ad hoc judge or a hearing but
15 shall provide written reasons for the denial.
16 Comments - 2021
17 (a) Paragraph A of this Article has been amended to require a motion to
18 recuse to be filed no later than thirty days after discovery of the facts constituting the
19 ground upon which the motion is based, but in all cases prior to the scheduling of the
20 matter for trial. This time limitation has been imposed to prevent the parties from
21 delaying the proceedings by using a late-filed motion to recuse as a manner of
22 obtaining a continuance of the trial. This provision recognizes that in some cases,
23 the facts constituting the ground upon which the motion to recuse is based occur
24 after, or could not have been discovered before, the matter is scheduled for trial. In
25 cases that fall under this exception, Paragraph A provides that the motion to recuse
26 shall be filed immediately after such facts occur or are discovered.
27 (b) Paragraph B of this Article has been amended to provide that when a
28 motion setting forth a ground for recusal has been timely filed, the judge who is the
29 subject of the motion shall either recuse himself or request in writing that the
30 supreme court appoint an ad hoc judge to hear the motion to recuse.
31 (c) If the motion to recuse is not timely filed or fails to set forth a ground for
32 recusal, Paragraph C of this Article permits the judge who is the subject of the
33 motion to deny it without the appointment of an ad hoc judge or a hearing, provided
34 that the judge gives written reasons for such denial. If a party disagrees with the
35 judge's denial of the motion to recuse pursuant to Paragraph C, the party may apply
36 for a supervisory writ or emergency supervisory writ seeking review of the judge's
37 decision.
Page 6 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 Art. 155. Selection of judge to try motion to recuse; court having two or more
2 judges
3 A. In a district court having two judges, the judge who is sought to be
4 recused shall have the Once a motion to recuse that sets forth a ground for recusal
5 under Article 151 is referred to the other judge of the court for trial of for hearing,
6 the supreme court shall appoint an ad hoc judge to hear the motion to recuse, and
7 only the ad hoc judge to whom the motion is assigned shall have the power and
8 authority to act in the cause pending disposition of the motion.
9 B. In a district court having more than two judges, the motion to recuse shall
10 be referred to another judge of the district court for trial through the random process
11 of assignment in accordance with the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Article
12 253.1.
13 Comments - 2021
14 (a) This Article has been amended to provide that in all cases where a motion
15 to recuse has been referred for hearing, the motion shall be heard by an ad hoc judge
16 appointed by the supreme court. This revision is intended to increase confidence in
17 Louisiana's district courts by reducing or eliminating the potential for impartiality
18 or bias that would result from allowing the motion to be heard by a judge of the same
19 court as the judge who is the subject of the motion.
20 (b) Once a motion to recuse has been referred for hearing, this Article
21 continues the rule that the judge who is the subject of the motion to recuse can no
22 longer take any action in the cause. Rather, the ad hoc judge who is appointed by the
23 supreme court shall have the power and authority to act in the cause until the motion
24 to recuse is decided.
25 Art. 156. Same; court having single Selection of judge after recusal
26 A. When a ground assigned for the recusation of the judge of a district court
27 having a single judge of a court having two or more judges is his interest in the
28 cause, the judge shall appoint a district judge of an adjoining district to try the
29 voluntarily recuses himself or is recused after a motion to recuse is heard, the cause
30 shall be randomly assigned to another division or section of that court.
31 B. When any other ground is assigned for the recusation of such a district
32 court judge in a single-judge district voluntarily recuses himself, he may appoint
33 either a district judge of an adjoining district, or a lawyer domiciled in the judicial
34 district who has the qualifications of a district judge, to try the motion to recuse the
Page 7 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 judge shall make a written request to the supreme court for the appointment of an ad
2 hoc judge to hear the cause. When an ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court
3 to hear a recusal grants the motion to recuse, that judge shall request that an ad hoc
4 judge be appointed to hear the cause.
5 The order of court appointing the judge ad hoc shall be entered on its
6 minutes, and a certified copy of the order shall be sent to the judge ad hoc.
7 Art. 157. Judge ad hoc appointed to try cause when judge recused; power of judge
8 ad hoc
9 A. After a trial judge recuses himself under the authority of Article 152(A),
10 a judge ad hoc shall be assigned to try the cause in the manner provided by Articles
11 155 and 156 for the appointment of a judge ad hoc to try the motion to recuse. When
12 a trial judge is recused after a trial of the motion therefor, the case shall be reassigned
13 to a new judge for trial of the cause under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure
14 Articles 155 and 156.
15 B. After a trial judge recuses himself under the authority of Article 152(B)
16 he shall make written application to the supreme court for the appointment of another
17 district judge as judge ad hoc to try the cause. The supreme court shall appoint a
18 judge from a judicial district other than the judicial district of the recused judge as
19 judge ad hoc to try the cause.
20 C. The judge ad hoc has the same power and authority to dispose of the
21 cause as the recused judge has in cases in which no ground for recusation exists.
22 Art. 158. Supreme court appointment of district judge to try cause when judge
23 recused
24 In a cause in which the district judge is recused, even when a judge ad hoc
25 has been appointed for the trial of the cause under Article 157, a party may apply to
26 the supreme court for the appointment of another district judge as judge ad hoc to try
27 the cause. If the supreme court deems it in the interest of justice, such appointment
28 shall be made.
Page 8 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 The order of the supreme court appointing a judge ad hoc shall be entered on
2 its minutes. The clerk of the supreme court shall forward two certified copies of the
3 order, one to the judge ad hoc appointed and the other to the clerk of the district court
4 where the cause is pending, for entry in its minutes.
5 Art. 159 157. Recusation Recusal of supreme court justice
6 A. A party desiring to recuse a justice of the supreme court shall file a
7 written motion therefor assigning the ground for recusal under Article 151. When
8 a written motion is filed to recuse a justice of the supreme court, he the justice may
9 recuse himself or the motion shall be heard by the other justices of the court.
10 B. When a justice of the supreme court recuses himself, or is recused, the
11 court may do one of the following:
12 (1) Have the cause argued before and disposed of by the other justices, or.
13 (2) Appoint a sitting or retired judge of a district court or a court of appeal
14 having the qualifications of a justice of the supreme court to act for the recused
15 justice in the hearing and disposition of the cause.
16 Art. 160 158. Recusation Recusal of judge of court of appeal
17 A. A party desiring to recuse a judge of a court of appeal shall file a written
18 motion therefor assigning the ground for recusal under Article 151. When a written
19 motion is filed to recuse a judge of a court of appeal, he the judge may recuse
20 himself or the motion shall be heard by the other judges on the panel to which the
21 cause is assigned, or by all judges of the court, except the judge sought to be recused,
22 sitting en banc an ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court.
23 B. When a judge of a court of appeal recuses himself, or is recused, the court
24 may (1) have the cause argued before and disposed of by the other judges of the
25 panel to which it is assigned, or (2) appoint shall randomly allot another of its judges,
26 a judge of a district court or a lawyer having the qualifications of a judge of a court
27 of appeal to act for to sit on the panel in place of the recused judge in the hearing and
28 disposition of the cause.
29 Art. 161 159. Recusation Recusal of ad hoc judge ad hoc
Page 9 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 A judge An ad hoc judge appointed to try a motion to recuse a judge, or
2 appointed to try the cause, may be recused on the grounds and in the manner
3 provided in this Chapter for the recusation recusal of judges.
4 * * *
5 CHAPTER 3. RECUSATION RECUSAL OF JUDGES; APPOINTMENT
6 OF JUDGES AD HOC
7 Art. 4861. Recusation Recusal of judges
8 * * *
9 Art. 4862. Motion to recuse
10 When a written motion is made to recuse a parish court or city court judge
11 or a justice of the peace, he the judge or justice of the peace shall either recuse
12 himself, or the motion to recuse shall be tried in the manner provided by Article
13 4863.
14 Art. 4863. Determination of recusation recusal; appointment of judge ad hoc
15 A. In a parish or city court having more than one judge, the motion to recuse
16 shall be tried by another judge of the same court, and, if the judge is recused, the case
17 shall be tried by another judge of the same court. The manner in which the judge is
18 selected to try the recusal and, in the event of recusal, to try the case, shall be
19 provided by rule of court.
20 B. In all other cases, the motion shall be tried by the district court and, if the
21 judge is recused, the district court shall try the case or shall appoint another judge of
22 a district, parish, or city court to try the case an ad hoc judge appointed by the
23 supreme court.
24 Art. 4864. Appointment of judge ad hoc when judge recuses himself after recusal
25 A. When a judge of a parish or city court recuses himself or is recused, he
26 shall appoint another judge of the same parish or city court shall be appointed to try
27 the cause, if that court has more than one division; otherwise, he shall appoint either
28 a parish or city court judge from an adjoining parish or, as judge-ad-hoc, an attorney
29 domiciled in the parish who has the qualifications of a parish or city court judge.
Page 10 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
1 The manner in which the judge is selected to try the cause shall be provided by rule
2 of court. In all other cases, an ad hoc judge shall be appointed by the supreme court
3 to try the cause.
4 B. When a justice of the peace recuses himself, he shall appoint another
5 justice of the peace shall be appointed by the supreme court to try the case cause.
6 Art. 4865. Appointment of judge ad hoc in event of temporary inability of parish or
7 city court judge to preside
8 * * *
9 Art. 4866. Power and authority of judge ad hoc
10 A judge ad hoc appointed under the provisions of Articles 4861 through 4865
11 shall have the same power and authority to act on the cases causes or on the dates to
12 which appointed as the judge whom he replaces would have.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 39 Original 2021 Regular Session Magee
Abstract: Provides with respect to the recusal of judges.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 151) sets forth mandatory and permissive grounds for recusal.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 151) retains the mandatory grounds for recusal provided by
present law and adds an additional ground requiring a judge to be recused when there exists
a substantial and objective basis that would reasonably be expected to prevent the judge from
conducting any aspect of the cause in a fair and impartial manner. Proposed law also makes
minor technical corrections.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 152) makes the permissive grounds for recusal provided by
present law disclosures that are required to be made by the judge to all attorneys and
unrepresented parties. Proposed law removes the requirement under present law that the
judge's relative with a substantial economic interest in the cause be living in the judge's
household and provides that any party may file a motion to recuse the judge if the disclosed
information gives rise to a ground for recusal.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 152) provides for the recusal of a judge on his own motion or by
the supreme court and requires a judge who self-recuses to provide the ground for recusal
in writing within 15 days.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 153) changes present law to require a judge who self-recuses to
contemporaneously file into the record the order of recusal and the written reasons therefor
and to also provide a copy to the judicial administrator of the supreme court.
Page 11 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 154) requires a motion to recuse to be filed prior to trial or hearing,
or if the facts are discovered after the trial or hearing, immediately after the facts are
discovered but prior to judgment.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 154) requires a motion to recuse to be filed no later than 30 days
after the facts are discovered but in all cases prior to the scheduling of the matter for trial,
unless the facts occur or could not have been discovered prior to this deadline, in which case
the motion to recuse shall be filed immediately after the occurrence or discovery of the facts.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 154) also provides that if a motion to recuse is not timely filed or
fails to set forth a ground for recusal, the judge who is the subject of the motion may deny
it without the appointment of another judge or a hearing, provided that the judge provides
written reasons for the denial.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 153) provides for the power and authority of the recused judge and
the judge to whom the motion to recuse is assigned to act in the cause.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 155) retains present law.
Present law (C.C.P. Arts. 155-157) permits judges from the same court as the judge who is
the subject of the motion to hear both the motion to recuse and the cause if the judge is
ultimately recused, and in single judge districts, allows the judge who is the subject of the
motion to select a judge from an adjoining district or a lawyer in the judicial district who has
the qualifications of a district judge.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 158) permits a party to apply to the supreme court for the
appointment of another judge to try the cause.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 155) provides that in all cases, motions to recuse shall be heard
by an ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 156) further provides that when a district court judge of a court
having two or more judges is recused, the cause shall be randomly assigned to another
division or section of the court, but in single judge districts, the cause shall be assigned to
an ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 159) provides for the recusal of a supreme court justice and allows
the court to either have the cause argued before and disposed of by the other justices or
appoint a judge having the qualifications of a supreme court justice to act for the recused
judge.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 157) retains present law but clarifies that the judge who is
appointed to act for the recused judge can either be a sitting or retired judge.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 160) provides for the recusal of a court of appeal judge and allows
the motion to recuse to be heard by the other judges on the panel or the remaining judges of
the court sitting en banc. Present law further provides that when a court of appeal judge is
recused, the court can either have the cause argued before and disposed of by the other
judges on the panel or appoint a judge having the qualifications of a court of appeal judge
to act for the recused judge.
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 158) changes present law to require the motion to recuse to be
heard by an ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court and to provide that when a court
of appeal judge is recused, the court must randomly allot another of its judges to sit on the
panel in place of the recused judge.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 161) provides for the recusal of an ad hoc judge.
Page 12 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 21RS-388 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 39
Proposed law (C.C.P. Art. 159) retains present law and makes minor technical corrections.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 4861) provides for the recusal of parish and city court judges and
justices of the peace.
Proposed law retains present law and makes minor technical corrections.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 4862) provides with respect to motions to recuse parish and city
court judges and justices of the peace.
Proposed law changes present law to require the motion to recuse to be in writing and makes
minor technical corrections.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 4863) provides that in parish or city courts having more than one
judge, both the motion to recuse and the cause shall be tried by another judge of the same
court. Present law further provides that in all other cases, the motion to recuse shall be tried
by the district court, and if the judge is recused, the district court shall either try the cause
or appoint another judge to try the cause.
Proposed law provides that in parish or city courts having more than one judge, the motion
to recuse shall be tried by another judge of the same court, and in all other cases, the motion
to recuse shall be tried by an ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 4864) allows a parish or city court judge who recuses himself to
appoint another judge of the same court, if the court has more than one division, or to
appoint a judge from an adjoining parish or an attorney who has the qualifications of a parish
or city court judge to try the cause. Present law also allows a justice of the peace who
recuses himself to appoint another justice of the peace to try the cause.
Proposed law changes present law to provide that when a parish or city court judge recuses
himself or is recused, another judge of the same court shall be appointed to try the cause if
that court has more than one division, and in all other cases, the cause shall be tried by an
ad hoc judge appointed by the supreme court. Proposed law further provides that when a
justice of the peace recuses himself, the cause shall be tried by a justice of the peace
appointed by the supreme court.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 4865) provides for the appointment of an ad hoc judge when a
parish or city court judge is temporarily unable to preside.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law (C.C.P. Art. 4866) provides for the power and authority of an ad hoc judge.
Proposed law retains present law and makes minor technical corrections.
(Amends Chapter 3 of Title I of Book I of the Code of Civil Procedure, the heading of
Chapter 3 of Title I of Book VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, and C.C.P. Arts.
4861(heading), 4862, 4863, 4864, 4865(heading), and 4866)
Page 13 of 13
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.