Louisiana 2021 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB573 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    SSHB573 416 3736
HOUSE SUMMARY OF SENATE AMENDMENTS
HB 573	2021 Regular Session	Stefanski
TAX COMMISSION, STATE:  Provides for the administration, review, and adjudication
of ad valorem tax assessments
Synopsis of Senate Amendments
1.Extends the jurisdiction of the Board of Tax Appeals to matters related to state
or local taxes or fees, concerning taxing districts and related proceeds, or to
contracts related to tax matters.
2.Defines a "local collector" to include any other political subdivision of the state
or other local taxing district.
3.Requires rules promulgated by the La. Tax Commission to be subject to
oversight by the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate
Committee on Revenue and Fiscal Affairs and authorizes the commission to use
emergency rulemaking procedures when necessary for the effective
administration of ad valorem taxes.
4.Authorizes a property owner to also provide an email address to an assessor
when a property owner is making a written request for notice of the current
year's assessment of his property.  Further provides that if an email address is
provided, the assessor shall email written notice of the assessed value of the 
property on the first day for the inspection of the assessment lists.
5.Repeals present law prohibition against petitioning the Board of Tax Appeals
to declare a law unconstitutional on the basis of its failure to meet the
constitutional requirements for the passage of laws by the legislature. 
6.Changes the effective date of proposed law from August 1, 2021, to Jan. 1,
2022, and provides for the applicability of proposed law.
Digest of Bill as Finally Passed by Senate
Present law provides for the establishment of the Board of Tax Appeals (board) to hear and
decide disputes between taxpayers and any state or local tax collector.  Present law provides
for the membership, qualifications, and appointments to the board.  
Proposed law retains present law as it relates to the board but expands the qualifications of
a nominee for a board position to include a person who has La. tax law experience rather
than a person with La. sales tax law experience.  
Proposed law increases the membership of the Local Tax Division Nominating Committee
from eight to ten members by adding a member who represents the La. Assessor's
Association and a representative selected by the Pelican Institute after consultation with the 
La. Chamber of Commerce Foundation.  Further expands the qualifications for members of
the nominating committee to include a certified La. assessor. 
Present law provides for the jurisdiction of the board which includes petitions for declaratory
judgment or actions related to the constitutionality of a law or ordinance or the validity of a
regulation concerning a state or local tax or fee.
Proposed law retains present law but adds that the board's jurisdiction over petitions for
declaratory judgement or other actions extends to matters related to state or local taxes or
Page 1 of 6 SSHB573 416 3736
fees, concerning taxing districts and related proceeds, or relating to contracts related to tax
matters.
Present law defines a "local collector" as an individual or entity responsible for collecting
occupational license or occupancy taxes, or local taxes or fees except those tax matters
within the jurisdiction of the La. Tax Commission (commission).
Proposed law adds ad valorem taxes to the taxes a local collector may collect and removes
the exclusion for tax matters within the jurisdiction of the commission.  Proposed law 
further defines a local collector to include an assessor or the commission if it is a party to a
proceeding related to appeals for the redetermination of an assessment or the determination
of an overpayment and any other political subdivision of the state or other local taxing
district.
Present law authorizes a taxpayer to appeal to the board for a redetermination of an
assessment or a determination of an overpayment when a taxpayer is aggrieved by an
assessment made by a state collector or by a state collector's action or failure to act on a
claim for refund or credit of an overpayment.  Present law establishes a procedure for a
taxpayer to file a petition for payment of taxes under protest.
Proposed law retains present law but specifies that a taxpayer must comply with the present
law procedure related to suits for payment of taxes under protest.
Proposed law sets forth a procedure for a relevant party who is aggrieved by an action of a
local collector, assessor, or the commission, if the action is appealable to the board.  Further
authorizes an intervention by and joinder of the relevant assessor as permitted or required by
present law.  Proposed law excludes actions concerning local tax sales, the nullification of
tax sales, or the contesting of the seizure of movables for collection from this procedure.
Present law requires the taxpayer and the collector to get notice and an opportunity to be
heard in each proceeding for the redetermination of an assessment, the consideration of a
payment under protest petition, or for the determination of an overpayment.  Further requires
decisions or judgments to be made as quickly as practicable.
Proposed law retains present law but adds a requirement that other parties to proceedings be
afforded notice and an opportunity to be heard.  
Present law authorizes an aggrieved party to petition the board for declaratory judgment or
other action related to the constitutionality of a law or ordinance or validity of a regulation
concerning any matter relating to any state or local tax or fee excluding those tax matters
within the jurisdiction of the La. Tax Commission pursuant to the provisions of present
constitution (Art. VII, Sec. 18(E)).
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law prohibits an aggrieved party from petitioning the board to declare a law
unconstitutional on the basis of its failure to meet the constitutional requirements for the
passage of laws by the legislature.
Proposed law repeals present law.
Present law authorizes the commission to adopt, amend, or revise rules and guidelines after
public hearings held in accordance with present law (the Administrative Procedure Act).
Proposed law retains present law but requires rules promulgated by the commission to be
subject to oversight by the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee
on Revenue and Fiscal Affairs and authorizes the commission to use emergency rulemaking
procedures when necessary for the effective administration of ad valorem taxes.
Page 2 of 6 SSHB573 416 3736
Present law provides for the determination of the appellate court that has jurisdiction over
decisions or judgments of the board including the court of appeal for the parish where the tax
is being litigated, the court the parties stipulate to have jurisdiction, or the court of appeal for
the parish of the appellee for a case appealed by a collector.
Proposed law retains present law but provides that if none of the options for review in
present law are applicable, the judgment may be reviewed by the court of appeal designated
by the board that has the most connection to the matter or, if none, the court of appeal for
East Baton Rouge Parish.
Present law requires the board to select a fiscal agent for its escrow account used to distribute
funds pursuant to certified copies of an order.  Further requires the account to be subject to
audit by the legislative auditor and for an annual report of account transactions concerning
state cases to be submitted to the Cash Management Review Board and an annual  report of
the account transactions concerning local tax cases to be submitted to the  La. Uniform Local
Sales Tax Board.
Proposed law retains present law but changes the entity to which the annual report for state
tax cases must be submitted from the Cash Management Review Board to the secretary of
the Dept. of Revenue and specifies that the annual report regarding local tax cases applies
to local sales tax cases. 
Proposed law requires an annual report of the account's transactions concerning local ad
valorem tax cases to be submitted to the written designee for the La. Sheriff's Association
and the written designee for the La. Assessor's Association.
Present law requires the commission to assess public service properties for purposes of ad
valorem taxes.  Further requires the commission to give notice of the initial determination
of the assessed valuation in writing to a company and the initial determination becomes final
if no protest is filed with the commission within 30 days after receipt by the company of the
notice of the initial determination.  Present law provides for a procedure for a company to
protest an initial valuation and a procedure for the company to appeal decisions of the
commission.  
Proposed law retains present law but authorizes parties to appeal to the board in suits
contesting the valuation or assessment of public service properties when the suit affects
assessments of property in more than one parish.  Further clarifies that references to
"reviewing court" in proposed law include the board. 
Present law authorizes the commission to correct or change the assessment of any company
in order to make the assessment conform to facts.  A company may institute a suit to contest
the correctness or legality of any corrections and changes of its assessed valuation by the
commission.
Proposed law retains present law related to the authorization for a company to contest the
correctness of an assessment but specifies that these suits shall be subject to provisions of
present law related to appeals of the final determination of the assessed value of property by
the commission.
Present law requires an assessor to annually assess and value property within the assessor's
jurisdiction for purposes of ad valorem property taxes.  Further provides for the assessment
procedure and time line an assessor is required to follow in order to notify a property owner
of the assessed value of his property.  Present law also sets forth a procedure for a property
owner to contest a property's valuation including the establishment of boards of review which
consists of the governing authorities in each parish.
Present law requires the commission to conduct public hearings within 10 days of receipt of
the assessment lists to hear real and personal property appeals of taxpayers, tax-recipient
bodies, or assessors from actions of the board of review.
Page 3 of 6 SSHB573 416 3736
Proposed law retains present law but requires a review of the correctness of an assessment
by an assessor to be confined to review of evidence presented to the assessor prior to the
close of the deadline for filing a complaint with the board of review.  If a taxpayer makes
application to present additional evidence before the date set for hearing on the appeal and
the commission finds that the additional evidence is material and there were reasons for
failure to timely present the evidence to the assessor, the commission may order the assessor
to take the additional evidence.  Authorizes an assessor to modify the assessment because of
the additional evidence and to notify the commission of modifications within 15 calendar
days of receipt of the additional evidence.
Proposed law provides that good reason for failure to timely present information to the
assessor is presumed to exist for reports and related attachments of any appraiser or other
expert ordered prior to the deadline for filing a complaint with the board of review if the
report and attachments are submitted to the assessor within 30 days of receipt of the reports
and attachments by the taxpayer and at least 25 days prior to a hearing before the
commission.
Proposed law provides that good reason for failure to timely present documents or evidence
is always presumed to exist when the otherwise admissible document or evidence is not
available to the taxpayer at the time of the deadline for submission to the assessor but is
provided to the assessor within 15 days of availability or consists of documents or records
of income or expenses concerning the valuation of oil and gas property when the taxpayer
has timely provided all information required by rule and the documents or records are
supplemental to the submission.
Proposed law exempts documents or records of income or expenses concerning the valuation
of oil and gas property from the presumption of good reason for failing to timely present 
documents or evidence if the documents were available to the taxpayer but not timely
provided in response to the assessor's request.
Proposed law authorizes witnesses to be used to authenticate or explain documents which
are otherwise admissible and provides for the use of publicly accessible data, guides, and
resources.  
Proposed law provides that a decision of the commission to deny a taxpayer's application to
present additional evidence shall, at the option of the taxpayer, be considered a final
determination for purposes of appeal or be subject to immediate review by application for
supervisory writ to the court of appeal.  Further provides that except as ordered by a court
of appeal, no stay of the proceedings before the La. Tax Commission may be issued pursuant
to an action to deny a taxpayer's application to present additional evidence.
Proposed law in appeals of the correctness of assessments, authorizes the commission to
independently appraise property and to enter that appraisal into evidence for consideration
on review of the correctness of the assessment.
Proposed law sets forth the actions the commission or a district court may take when
reviewing the correctness of an assessment by an assessor and provides for specific reasons
that may warrant the commission or the district court to reverse or modify the assessor's
assessment.
Present law authorizes a property owner to make a written request for notice of the current
year's assessment of his property no sooner than the first day of June of that year.  Proposed
law requires the request to be received by the assessor of the parish or district in which the
property is located no later than June 15
th
 of that same year.
Proposed law retains present law but authorizes a property owner to also provide an email
address to the assessor.  If an email address is provided, the assessor shall email written
notice of the assessed value of the related property on the first day for the inspection of the
assessment lists.
Page 4 of 6 SSHB573 416 3736
Proposed law provides that if an assessor receives additional information from a taxpayer
after the assessment lists have been certified to the board of review but before the filing of
a complaint with the board of review, the assessor may modify the assessment to make a
reduction based on the additional evidence.  Reductions in assessments shall be
communicated to the taxpayer and the board of review no less than 24 hours prior to the
board of review's public hearing. 
Present law authorizes a taxpayer who is dissatisfied with the final determination of the
commission concerning the correctness of an assessment to file a suit within 30 days of the
entry of a final decision of the commission in the district court for the parish where the
commission is domiciled or the district court of the parish where the property is located.
Present law establishes a procedure for claims against a political subdivision for ad valorem
taxes erroneously paid to the political subdivision which includes presenting the claim to the
commission within three years of the date of the payment.  Further provides a procedure for
a taxpayer who prevails in their claim to present a claim to the commission to receive a
refund of the payments.  Authorizes an appeal to the district court if an assessor or the
commission refuses to approve a claim for a refund.
Proposed law retains present law but authorizes a taxpayer to also appeal to the board.
Present law establishes a procedure for a taxpayer to challenge the correctness of an
assessment or a legality challenge by timely paying the disputed amount under protest to the
tax collector.  Present law provides for the proper party defendants who must be included in
these suits. 
Proposed law retains present law but provides for the proper party defendants who must be
included in a correctness challenge related to appeals of actions by a board of review related
to the inspection of assessment lists and notification and review of assessments and appeals
of final determinations by the commission.  Further provides that a legality challenge may
be brought by a petition for recovery of a tax paid under protest before the board which shall
provide a legal remedy and right of action for a full and complete adjudication of all
questions arising in connection with the tax.
Present law authorizes a taxpayer, in cases of an additional assessment, to pay the additional
assessment under protest without having to file an additional suit if the taxpayer shows that
the principle of law involved in an additional assessment is already pending before the court
for judicial determination and if the taxpayer agrees to abide by the pending court's decision.
Proposed law retains present law but specifies that the assessment under protest may also be
under consideration by the board.
Present law requires forms filed by a taxpayer to be considered confidential and limits use
solely for purposes of administering the provisions of present law and for verifying eligibility
for tax credits.  Exempts these forms from the provisions of present law concerning public
records; however, the forms are admissible in evidence and subject to discovery in judicial
or administrative proceedings.
Proposed law retains present law but specifies that the admissibility of the forms into
evidence shall be subject to present law protections related to use of confidential information
provided by court order.  Further provides that forms shall include all information provided
by a taxpayer to an assessor.
Proposed law provides that the provisions of proposed law amending R.S. 47:1989 shall be 
prospective only and shall not be applicable to any case pending before the La. Tax
Commission or in any court on Jan. 1, 2022.  The remaining provisions of proposed law are
procedural, but the provisions of proposed law amending R.S. 47:1998 shall not be
applicable to any case pending in any court on Jan. 1, 2022.
Page 5 of 6 SSHB573 416 3736
Effective Jan. 1, 2022.
(Amends R.S. 47:1402(D)(2), (3)(intro. para.), and (5), 1403(B)(6)(c), 1407(3) and (7),
1418(4)(b) and (c), 1431(B), 1432(A), 1436(B), 1437(A), 1439(C), 1856(D)(2) and (3) and
(G), 1857(B)(1), 1989(C), 1998(A)(1)(a) and (b)(i) and (D), 2132(D), 2134(B)(3), (D), and
(E)(1), and 2327; Adds R.S. 47:1402(D)(3)(h) and (i), 1403(B)(6)(d), 1418(4)(d) and (e),
1431(F), 1432(B), 1837(G)(3), 1856(H), 1857(B)(3), 1992(A)(3) and (B)(3) and 1998(H) and
(I); Repeals R.S. 47:1431(D)(2) and 1432(D))
Page 6 of 6