Louisiana House Bill HB75

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/21
• Refer: 3/9/21

Caption

Extends the Fishermen's Gear Compensation Fund and extends payments into the Underwater Obstruction Removal Fund

Impact

The extension of these funds is crucial for maintaining support for the fishing industry, especially in communities heavily reliant on fishing. By prolonging the existence of the Fishermen's Gear Compensation Fund, the bill reinforces the state’s commitment to safeguarding the interests of commercial fishermen. The ongoing payments into the Underwater Obstruction Removal Fund also highlight the need for active management and removal of potentially hazardous materials from waterways, thereby ensuring safer conditions for fishing operations.

Summary

House Bill 75 aims to extend the Fishermen's Gear Compensation Fund and make provisions for payments into the Underwater Obstruction Removal Fund until June 30, 2026. This bill is particularly relevant for commercial fishermen in Louisiana, providing a safety net for those who experience damage to their gear due to underwater obstructions. These obstructions can stem from natural causes or human activities, primarily in the context of oil and gas operations, where hazards might not be flagged or known to fishermen in advance.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 75 appears to be supportive among stakeholders in the fishing community. Fishermen and industry advocates recognize the importance of these funds for their livelihood and the overall health of the fishing sector. The extended funding is seen as a necessary measure to mitigate the risks posed by underwater hazards, ensuring that fishermen can operate with appropriate safety nets.

Contention

Despite the overall positive reception, there may be points of contention concerning the financial management of the funds and the effectiveness of the obstruction removal process. Some critics could argue about the sustainability of funding sources and whether the state's priorities should shift towards more preventive measures rather than compensatory systems. Additionally, ongoing debates about the environmental impacts of fishing practices could influence discussions surrounding the funds' administration and focus.