HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
2022 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 247
BY REPRESENTATIVE MAGEE
(On Recommendation of the Louisiana State Law Institute)
CRIMINAL/PROCEDURE: Provides relative to the recusal of judges
1 AN ACT
2To amend and reenact the heading of Title XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the
3 heading of Chapter 1 of Title XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of
4 Criminal Procedure Articles 671 through 676, 678, and 679, the heading of Chapter
5 3 of Title XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and Code of Criminal Procedure
6 Article 684, and to repeal Code of Criminal Procedure Article 677, relative to the
7 recusal of judges; to provide for the grounds for recusal; to provide for recusal on the
8 motion of the court; to provide for authority of judges; to provide for the procedure
9 for recusal; to provide for the selection of a judge to try the motion to recuse; to
10 provide for the selection of a judge after recusal; to provide for the recusal of an ad
11 hoc judge, appellate judge, and supreme court justice; to provide for review of
12 recusal rulings; and to provide for related matters.
13Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
14 Section 1. The heading of Title XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the heading
15of Chapter 1 of Title XXII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure
16Articles 671 through 676, 678, and 679, the heading of Chapter 3 of Title XXII of the Code
17of Criminal Procedure, and Code of Criminal Procedure Article 684 are hereby amended and
18reenacted to read as follows:
Page 1 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 TITLE XXII
2 RECUSATION RECUSAL OF JUDGES AND DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
3 CHAPTER 1. RECUSATION RECUSAL OF JUDGES
4 Art. 671. Grounds for recusation recusal of judge
5 A. In a criminal case cause, a judge of any trial or appellate court, trial or
6 appellate, shall be recused when he upon any of the following grounds:
7 (1) Is The judge is biased, prejudiced, or personally interested in the cause
8 to such an extent that he the judge would be unable to conduct a fair and impartial
9 trial;.
10 (2) Is The judge is the spouse of the accused, of the party injured, of an
11 attorney employed in the cause, or of the district attorney; or is related to the accused
12 or the party injured, or to the spouse of the accused or party injured, within the fourth
13 degree; or is related to an attorney employed in the cause or to the district attorney,
14 or to the spouse of either, within the second degree;.
15 (3) Has The judge has been employed or consulted as an attorney in the
16 cause, or has been associated with an attorney during the latter's employment in the
17 cause;.
18 (4) Is The judge is a witness in the cause;.
19 (5) Has The judge performed a judicial act in the case cause in another court;
20 or.
21 (6) Would The judge would be unable, for any other reason, to conduct a fair
22 and impartial trial.
23 B. In a criminal cause, a judge of any trial or appellate court shall also be
24 recused when there exists a substantial and objective basis that would reasonably be
25 expected to prevent the judge from conducting any aspect of the cause in a fair and
26 impartial manner.
27 B.C. In any cause in which the state, or a political subdivision thereof, or a
28 religious body is interested, the fact that the judge is a citizen of the state or a
29 resident of the political subdivision, or pays taxes thereto, or is a member of the
Page 2 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 religious body is not of itself a ground for recusation recusal. In any cause in which
2 a religious body or religious corporation is interested, the fact that a judge is a
3 member of the religious body or religious corporation is not alone a ground for
4 recusal.
5 Comments - 2022
6 (a) This Article generally follows Code of Civil Procedure Article 151, with
7 such adaptations as are necessary to adjust the grounds for recusal to the special
8 differences in criminal proceedings.
9 (b) Subparagraph (A)(1) is the most important ground for recusal. It
10 continues the rule that interest in the cause is a ground for recusal and includes the
11 much-needed provision that bias or prejudice is also a ground for recusal. Bias or
12 prejudice of the trial judge was not a ground for recusal prior to the 1928 Code. In
13 State v. Phillips, 106 So. 375 (La. 1925), it was held that "interested in the cause"
14 means that the judge must have some personal gain at stake before he can be recused.
15 The Louisiana Supreme Court followed this rule after the 1928 Code in State v.
16 LaBorde, 38 So. 2d 371 (La. 1948). Recognition of bias or prejudice as a ground for
17 recusal is in line with the basic purpose of recusal procedure, i.e., to protect the
18 defendant's right to a fair and impartial trial. The requirement that the bias,
19 prejudice, or interest must be such that the judge would be unable to conduct a fair
20 and impartial trial is a standard requiring that the disqualifying bias, interest, or
21 prejudice must be of a substantial nature.
22 (c) Subparagraph (A)(2) is similar to Code of Civil Procedure Article
23 152(A)(4) in specifying the degrees of relationship that will serve as a ground for
24 recusal of the judge. In addition, Subparagraph (A)(2) clarifies that the district
25 attorney is one of the attorneys to whom the relationships apply.
26 (d) Subparagraph (A)(3) follows Code of Civil Procedure Article 151(A)(2).
27 State v. Perkins, 50 So. 805 (La. 1910), held that the statutory provision was met
28 when the judge was previously employed on the same matter in a civil proceeding.
29 (e) Subparagraph (A)(4), in conformity with Code of Civil Procedure Article
30 151(A)(1), provides for recusal if the judge is a material witness in the cause.
31 Construing Article 303 of the 1928 Code of Criminal Procedure, the Louisiana
32 Supreme Court stated that it "contemplates and refers to the judge's being a material
33 witness in the actual trial of the criminal cause and before the court - not a witness
34 at a hearing to determine whether he should be recused." State v. Riviere, 72 So. 2d
35 316, 319 (La. 1954). In State v. Kelly, 128 So. 2d 18 (La. 1961), the court stated that
36 the testimony of the judge must relate to the defendant's guilt or innocence. Under
37 this logical interpretation of the phrase "material witness," the judge would not be
38 recused if he had been called to testify to a matter relating to something other than
39 the guilt or innocence.
40 (f) Subparagraph (A)(5) follows Code of Civil Procedure Article 152(A)(3)
41 and makes no change in the law. Beginning with State v. Bill, 15 La. Ann. 114
42 (1860), it has been consistently held that a judge is competent to conduct the trial
43 after a mistrial has been declared, and retrial of a case after a new trial is ordered
44 may also be held before the same judge who originally tried the case.
45 (g) The term "cause" rather than "case" is used in this Chapter. The broader
46 word "cause" embraces the entire situation, in both its civil and criminal
47 implications. The word "case" is limited to the particular criminal prosecution at bar.
Page 3 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 "Case is more of a limited signification, importing a collection of facts, with the
2 conclusion of law thereon, whereas cause imports a judicial proceeding entire, and
3 is nearly synonymous with lis in Latin, or suit in English." Black's Law Dictionary
4 (11th ed. 2019).
5 (h) Subparagraph (A)(6) is a catchall provision to include circumstances that
6 clearly indicate that the judge would not be able to serve fairly and impartially, even
7 though none of the specified grounds for recusal exist.
8 (i) A new Paragraph B has been added to provide an additional mandatory
9 ground for recusal when a substantial and objective basis exists that would
10 reasonably be expected to prevent the judge from conducting any aspect of the case
11 in a fair and impartial manner. This provision is intended to serve as a catch-all
12 supplementing the mandatory grounds for recusal set forth in Paragraph A and to
13 incorporate a clearer, more objective standard than the language of Canon 3C of the
14 Code of Judicial Conduct, which provides that a judge should recuse himself when
15 "the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned."
16 (j) Paragraph C, like Code of Civil Procedure Article 151(C), serves to
17 avoid frivolous claims that the judge is interested or prejudiced by reason of his
18 residence, or his membership in a religious organization that may be interested in the
19 prosecution. It will be significant in connection with the remaining provisions of this
20 Article.
21 (k) The terms "court" and "judge" are broadly defined by Article 931 to
22 include the various courts with criminal jurisdiction, except mayors' courts and
23 justice of the peace courts.
24 Art. 672. Recusation Recusal on court's own motion; by supreme court
25 A. A judge may recuse himself in any cause in which a ground for recusal
26 exists, whether or not a motion for his recusation recusal has been filed by a party
27 or not, in any case in which a ground for recusation exists.
28 On the written application of a trial judge, the supreme court may recuse him
29 for any reason that it considers sufficient.
30 B. Prior to the cause being allotted to another judge, a judge who recuses
31 himself for any reason shall contemporaneously file in the record the order of recusal
32 and written reasons that provide the factual basis for recusal under Article 671. The
33 judge shall also provide a copy of the recusal and the written reasons therefor to the
34 judicial administrator of the supreme court.
35 Comments - 2022
36 (a) Paragraph A of this Article conforms with the generally accepted view
37 that a judge may recuse himself only if there is a valid ground for recusal. State ex
38 rel. Jones v. Judge, 6 So. 22 (La. 1889). This provision is broad enough to allow a
39 judge to recuse himself without a motion being filed.
Page 4 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 (b) Paragraph B of this Article is new and requires the judge to file written
2 reasons containing the factual basis for the judge's self-recusal prior to the cause
3 being allotted to another judge. This provision also requires the judge to provide a
4 copy of both the recusal and the written reasons for the recusal to the judicial
5 administrator of the supreme court. This reporting requirement reflects the
6 countervailing considerations of a judge's duty to sit and his obligation to recuse
7 when a valid ground for recusal exists. A judge is "not at liberty, nor does he have
8 the right, to take himself out of a case and burden another judge with his
9 responsibility without good and legal cause." In re Lemoine, 686 So. 2d 837 (La.
10 1997).
11 (c) The factual basis for the judge's recusal must pertain to one of the
12 grounds for recusal set forth in Article 671. The fact that a judicial complaint has
13 been filed against the judge by one of the parties, without more, is not sufficient to
14 constitute a ground for recusal.
15 Art. 673. Judge may act until recused
16 A judge has full power and authority to act, even though a ground for
17 recusation recusal exists, until he is recused, or a motion for his recusation recusal
18 is filed. The judge to whom the motion to recuse is assigned shall have full power
19 and authority to act in the cause pending the disposition of the motion to recuse.
20 Comments - 2022
21 This Article provides a judge who has been selected to hear a motion to
22 recuse with full power and authority to act in the cause, but such power and authority
23 is discretionary. This provision is not intended to require the judge selected to hear
24 the recusal to act on other matters in the cause.
25 Art. 674. Procedure for recusation recusal of trial judge
26 A. A party desiring to recuse a trial judge shall file a written motion therefor
27 assigning the ground for recusation recusal under Article 671. The motion shall be
28 filed not later than thirty days after discovery of the facts constituting the ground
29 upon which the motion is based, but in all cases at least thirty days prior to
30 commencement of the trial. unless the party discovers In the event that the facts
31 constituting the ground for recusation recusal occur thereafter, in which event it or
32 the party moving for recusal could not, in the exercise of due diligence, have
33 discovered such facts, the motion to recuse shall be filed immediately after the facts
34 occur or are discovered, but prior to verdict or judgment.
35 B. If a valid ground for recusation is set forth in the motion to recuse sets
36 forth facts constituting a ground for recusal under Article 671, not later than seven
37 days after the judge's receipt of the motion from the clerk of court, the judge shall
Page 5 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 either recuse himself, or refer the motion for hearing to another judge or to a an ad
2 hoc judge ad hoc, as provided in Article 675.
3 C. If the motion to recuse is not timely filed in accordance with Paragraph
4 A of this Article or fails to set forth facts constituting a ground for recusal under
5 Article 671, the judge may deny the motion without referring the motion to another
6 judge or to an ad hoc judge for hearing but shall provide written reasons for the
7 denial.
8 Comments - 2022
9 (a) This Article follows Code of Civil Procedure Article 154 with such
10 changes as are necessary in criminal proceedings. A ground that is not urged timely
11 in conformity with this Article is waived.
12 (b) Paragraph A of this Article has been amended to require a motion to
13 recuse to be filed no later than thirty days after discovery of the facts constituting the
14 ground upon which the motion is based, but in all cases at least thirty days prior to
15 commencement of the trial. This time limitation has been imposed to prevent the
16 parties from delaying the proceedings by using a late-filed motion to recuse as a
17 manner of obtaining a continuance of the trial. This provision recognizes that in
18 some cases, the facts constituting the ground upon which the motion to recuse is
19 based occur after, or could not have been discovered before, thirty days prior to
20 commencement of trial. In cases that fall under this exception, Paragraph A provides
21 that the motion to recuse shall be filed immediately after such facts occur or are
22 discovered.
23 (c) Paragraph B of this Article requires a judge who is the subject of a valid
24 motion to recuse to either recuse himself or refer the motion to another judge for
25 hearing. A new time limitation has been added to require such action to be taken by
26 the judge within seven days after the judge receives the motion to recuse from the
27 clerk of court.
28 (d) When the judge is recused after the trial is commenced, it is necessary
29 to declare a mistrial and completely retry the case before the new judge. This
30 situation is covered by the ground for a mistrial stated in Article 775(5), i.e., physical
31 impossibility to proceed with the trial in conformity with law.
32 (e) If the motion to recuse is not timely filed or fails to set forth facts
33 constituting a ground for recusal, Paragraph C of this Article permits the judge who
34 is the subject of the motion to deny it without referring it to another judge or to an
35 ad hoc judge for hearing, but the judge must give written reasons for the denial. If
36 a party disagrees with the judge's denial of the motion to recuse pursuant to
37 Paragraph C, the party may apply for a supervisory writ or emergency supervisory
38 writ seeking review of the judge's decision.
39 Art. 675. Selection of ad hoc judge ad hoc to try motion to recuse
40 A. In a court having two judges, the judge who is sought to be recused shall
41 refer the motion to recuse to the other judge of that court.
Page 6 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 B. In a court having more than two judges, the motion to recuse shall be
2 referred to another judge of the court through a random process as provided by the
3 rules of court.
4 C. When the ground assigned for the recusation of the judge of a district
5 court having one judge is that he is biased, prejudiced, or personally interested in the
6 cause, the judge shall appoint a district judge of an adjoining district to try the
7 motion to recuse. When any other ground is assigned for the recusation of such a
8 district judge, he may appoint either a district judge of an adjoining district or a
9 lawyer domiciled in the judicial district who has the qualifications of a district judge
10 to try the motion to recuse. In a city court, a separate juvenile court, or a family
11 court, when the court has a single judge, the judge shall refer the motion to recuse
12 to a district judge of his district. In a court having only one judge, the judge shall
13 make a written request to the supreme court for the appointment of an ad hoc judge
14 to try the motion to recuse.
15 D. The order of the court appointing a an ad hoc judge ad hoc shall be
16 entered on the minutes of the court, and the clerk of court shall forward a certified
17 copy of the order to the appointed ad hoc judge ad hoc. The motion to recuse shall
18 be tried promptly in a contradictory hearing in the court in which the case cause is
19 pending.
20 Comments - 2022
21 This Article is similar to the corresponding provisions of Code of Civil
22 Procedure Articles 155 (applicable to district courts) and 4863 (applicable to city
23 courts) with such changes as are necessary in criminal proceedings.
24 Art. 676. Judge ad hoc Ad hoc judge to try case cause when judge recused
25 A. When a district court judge, or a judge of a separate juvenile court or of
26 a family court, recuses himself, a judge ad hoc shall be assigned to try the case in the
27 manner provided by Article 675 for the appointment of a judge ad hoc to try a
28 motion to recuse. When a city court judge of a court having a single judge recuses
29 himself, he shall appoint to try the case either a city court judge from an adjoining
Page 7 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 parish or a lawyer who is domiciled in the parish and has the qualifications of a city
2 court judge.
3 B. When a district court judge or a judge of a separate juvenile court or of
4 a family court When a judge of a court having more than two judges recuses himself
5 or is recused after a trial of the motion, the matter shall be randomly reassigned to
6 another judge for trial of the case cause in accordance with the procedures contained
7 in Code of Criminal Procedure Article 675.
8 B. When a judge of a court having two judges recuses himself or is recused
9 after a trial of the motion, the cause shall be tried by the other judge of that court.
10 C. When a city court the judge of a court having a single only one judge
11 recuses himself or is recused after a trial on of the motion, the supreme court shall
12 appoint an ad hoc judge ad hoc who tried the motion to recuse shall appoint to try the
13 case cause either a city court judge from an adjoining parish or a lawyer who is
14 domiciled in the parish and has the qualifications of a city court judge.
15 C. When a city court has two judges, if a judge recuses himself or is recused,
16 the case shall be tried by the other judge of that court.
17 D. When a city court has more than two judges, if a judge recuses himself
18 or is recused, the case shall be tried by another judge of that court through a random
19 reassignment process.
20 E.D. The ad hoc judge ad hoc has the same power and authority to dispose
21 of the case cause as the recused judge would have.
22 Comments - 2022
23 The provisions of this Article are similar to Code of Civil Procedure Articles
24 156 and 4864. If a judge is recused, the cause will be allotted to another judge in the
25 same court. In courts with only one judge, the supreme court will appoint an ad hoc
26 judge to hear the cause.
27 * * *
28 Art. 678. Recusation of judge Recusal of ad hoc judge
29 A judge An ad hoc judge appointed to try a motion to recuse a judge, or
30 appointed to try the case cause, may be recused on the grounds and in the manner
31 provided in this Chapter for the recusation recusal of judges.
Page 8 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 Comments - 2022
2 This Article is taken verbatim from Code of Civil Procedure Article 159.
3 Art. 679. Recusation Recusal of an appellate judge and a supreme court justice
4 A. A party desiring to recuse a judge of a court of appeal shall file a written
5 motion therefor assigning the ground for recusal under Article 671. When a written
6 motion is filed to recuse a judge of a court of appeal, he the judge may recuse
7 himself or the motion shall be heard by the other judges on the panel to which the
8 cause is assigned, or by all judges of the court, except the judge sought to be recused,
9 sitting en banc.
10 B. When a judge of a court of appeal recuses himself or is recused, the court
11 shall appoint randomly allot another of its judges to act for the recused judge in the
12 hearing and disposition of the case cause.
13 C. If the motion to recuse fails to set forth facts constituting a ground for
14 recusal under Article 671, the judge may deny the motion without a hearing but shall
15 provide written reasons for the denial.
16 D. A party desiring to recuse a justice of the supreme court shall file a
17 written motion therefore assigning the ground for recusal under Article 671. When
18 a written motion is filed to recuse a justice of the supreme court, he the justice may
19 recuse himself or the motion shall be heard by the other justices of the court.
20 D.E. When a justice of the supreme court recuses himself, or is recused, the
21 court may have the case cause argued before and disposed of by the other justices or
22 appoint a sitting or retired judge of a district court or of a court of appeal having the
23 qualifications of a justice of the supreme court to sit as a member of the court in the
24 hearing and disposition of the case cause.
25 Comments - 2022
26 (a) Neither this Article nor its source provision states the time when the
27 motion to recuse a judge of a court of appeal or a justice of the supreme court must
28 be filed. However, it is certain that the motion must be filed before the court has
29 rendered its decision. State v. Jefferson Parish School Board, 19 So. 2d 153 (La.
30 1943). The general limitation of Article 674, that the motion for recusal shall be
31 filed "at least thirty days prior to commencement of the trial," does not apply to this
32 special situation. A ground for recusal of a judge of a court of appeal or a supreme
Page 9 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 court justice will sometimes become apparent, for the first time, during the hearing
2 before that court.
3 (b) This Article includes language from Code of Civil Procedure Article 158
4 that provides a specific procedure for the resolution of a motion to recuse an
5 appellate judge.
6 (c) Paragraph C of this Article is similar to Article 674 in that it allows a
7 judge of a court of appeal to deny a motion to recuse that fails to set forth facts
8 constituting a ground for recusal without a hearing, but the judge must give written
9 reasons for the denial.
10 * * *
11 CHAPTER 3. REVIEW OF RECUSATION RECUSAL RULING
12 Art. 684. Review of recusation recusal ruling
13 A. If a judge or a district attorney is recused over the objection of the state,
14 or if an application by the state for recusation of a judge is denied, the state may
15 apply for a review of the ruling by supervisory writs. The defendant may not appeal
16 prior to sentence from a ruling recusing or refusing to recuse the judge or the district
17 attorney.
18 B. If a judge is recused over the objection of the state or the defendant, or if
19 a motion by the state or the defendant to recuse a judge is denied, the party's
20 exclusive remedy is to apply for a review of the ruling by supervisory writs. A
21 ruling recusing or refusing to recuse the judge shall not be considered on appeal.
22 C. Upon ruling on a motion to recuse a judge, the judge shall advise the
23 defendant in open court or in writing that the ruling may be reviewed only by a
24 timely filed supervisory writ to the appellate court and shall not be raised on appeal.
25 Comments - 2022
26 (a) Under Paragraph A of this Article, the manner in which rulings
27 concerning recusals of district attorneys are reviewed remains the same and has not
28 been changed.
29 (b) Paragraph B of this Article provides that if either party seeks to challenge
30 a ruling concerning the recusal of a judge, the party must do so in the form of a
31 timely filed supervisory writ. This is the party's exclusive remedy. This revision is
32 intended to ensure that rulings concerning the recusal of a judge are reviewed prior
33 to the trial on the merits.
34 (c) Because Paragraph B of this Article creates an exception to a defendant's
35 constitutional right to an appeal, Paragraph C requires the judge to advise the
36 defendant that the recusal ruling may be reviewed only by a timely filed supervisory
37 writ and cannot be raised on appeal. This notice must be given in open court or in
Page 10 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
1 writing, and the form of the notice will likely depend upon the manner in which the
2 recusal ruling is made. The failure of the judge to provide the required notice to the
3 defendant may give rise to the issue of recusal being reviewed on appeal.
4 Section 2. Code of Criminal Procedure Article 677 is hereby repealed in its entirety.
5 Section 3. The existing Comments to Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 671
6through 679 and 684 are superseded by the Comments appearing beneath those Articles in
7this Act. The Louisiana State Law Institute is hereby directed to remove the existing
8Comments and to print only the Comments appearing in this Act.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 247 Original 2022 Regular Session Magee
Abstract: Provides with respect to the recusal of judges.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 671) sets forth the grounds for recusal.
Proposed law retains present law and adds an additional ground requiring a judge to be
recused when there exists a substantial and objective basis that would reasonably be
expected to prevent the judge from conducting any aspect of the cause in a fair and impartial
manner. Proposed law also makes technical corrections.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 672) provides for the recusal of a judge on his own motion or by
the supreme court.
Proposed law changes present law to require a judge who self-recuses to contemporaneously
file into the record the order of recusal and the written reasons therefor and to also provide
a copy to the judicial administrator of the supreme court.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 673) provides for the power and authority of the judge to act in the
cause.
Proposed law retains present law and makes technical corrections.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 674) requires a motion to recuse to be filed prior to commencement
of the trial, or if the facts are discovered thereafter, immediately after the facts are
discovered but prior to verdict or judgment. Present law also requires a judge who is the
subject of a valid motion to recuse to recuse himself or refer the motion for hearing.
Proposed law requires a motion to recuse to be filed not later than 30 days after the facts are
discovered but in all cases at least 30 days prior to commencement of the trial. Proposed law
retains the exception in present law for facts that occur or are discovered after this deadline.
Proposed law retains present law concerning the action of the judge on the motion to recuse
but adds a time limitation that requires the judge to act not later than seven days after the
judge receives the motion from the clerk of court.
Page 11 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions. HLS 22RS-740 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 247
Proposed law also provides that if a motion to recuse is not timely filed or fails to set forth
facts constituting a ground for recusal, the judge who is the subject of the motion may deny
it without referring it to another judge but must give written reasons for the denial.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 675) sets forth the procedures for referring a motion to recuse to
another judge for hearing and, in courts having only one judge, permits the judge to appoint
a district judge from an adjoining district or a lawyer domiciled in the district to hear the
motion to recuse.
Proposed law changes present law to provide that in courts having only one judge, the
supreme court shall appoint another judge to hear the motion to recuse.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 676) sets forth the procedures for selecting another judge to try the
cause when the judge who is the subject of a motion to recuse has been recused.
Proposed law changes present law to provide that in courts having more than two judges, the
cause shall be randomly reassigned to another judge. Additionally provides that in courts
having two judges, the cause shall be tried by the other judge, and in courts having only one
judge, the supreme court shall appoint another judge to try the cause.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 677) allows the defendant or district attorney, after a judge is
recused and an ad hoc judge has been appointed to try the cause, to apply to the supreme
court for the appointment of another judge.
Proposed law repeals present law.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 678) provides for the recusal of an ad hoc judge appointed to try
the motion to recuse or the cause.
Proposed law retains present law and makes technical corrections.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 679) provides for the recusal of a court of appeal judge or of a
supreme court justice.
Proposed law retains present law and allows an appellate court judge who is the subject of
a motion to recuse that fails to set forth facts constituting a ground for recusal to deny the
motion without a hearing, provided the judge gives written reasons for the denial. Proposed
law also makes technical corrections.
Present law (C.Cr.P. Art. 684) provides for the review of recusal rulings, allowing the state
to apply for review by supervisory writs and prohibiting the defendant from raising issues
concerning recusal until after sentence on appeal.
Proposed law retains present law with respect to recusals of district attorneys.
Proposed law changes present law with respect to recusals of judges to require both sides to
apply for review by supervisory writs and to provide that this shall be the exclusive remedy.
Proposed law also requires the judge to advise the defendant in open court that rulings
concerning recusals of judges cannot be raised on appeal.
(Amends the heading of Title XXII of the C.Cr.P., the heading of Chapter 1 of Title XXII
of the C.Cr.P., C.Cr.P. Arts. 671-676, 678, and 679, the heading of Chapter 3 of Title XXII
of the C.Cr.P., and C.Cr.P. Art. 684; Repeals C.Cr.P. Art. 677)
Page 12 of 12
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.