Louisiana House Bill HB438

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/22
• Refer: 3/2/22
• Refer: 3/14/22
• Report Pass: 5/2/22
• Engrossed: 5/10/22
• Refer: 5/11/22

Caption

Reduces the rate of the state sales and use tax (EG -$138,600,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 438 would amend existing state tax law and directly impact revenue generation from sales tax, projected to reduce state revenue by approximately $138.6 million. Proponents of the bill argue that a lower sales tax rate can enhance consumer spending and help local economies recover, especially after the economic challenges posed by recent events. This change is positioned as a temporary measure intended to provide immediate relief for taxpayers while also promoting economic growth during the recovery phase.

Summary

House Bill 438 aims to significantly reduce the state's temporary sales and use tax rate, decreasing it from 0.45% to 0.15% over a designated two-year period, from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2025. This gradual reduction plan entails a decrease to 0.30% in the first year and a further reduction to 0.15% in the second year. The current sales and use tax is set to expire on June 30, 2025, but this bill modifies its rate for the interim period. By lowering this tax, the bill seeks to alleviate the financial burden on consumers and stimulate economic activity.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 438 appears to be largely supportive among legislators who favor tax relief strategies. However, there are voices of caution regarding the potential long-term implications for state revenue. Supporters characterize the bill as a necessary measure to invigorate spending and support families during difficult economic times. Conversely, opponents express concern over the substantial revenue loss and the challenge it may present in funding state services, raising questions about sustainability and fiscal responsibility.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the trade-off between reducing tax rates for consumers and ensuring adequate funding for state programs and services. Critics argue that the tax reduction could exacerbate funding issues for essential services as revenues decline. Additionally, the bill’s reliance on future economic growth to offset the tax cut's impact raises concerns among some fiscal analysts. The debate underscores the balance legislators must strike between incentivizing economic activity through tax relief and maintaining sufficient state resources to meet public needs.