Louisiana House Bill HB456

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/14/22
• Report Pass: 3/23/22
• Engrossed: 4/6/22
• Refer: 4/7/22
• Report Pass: 5/25/22
• Enrolled: 6/2/22
• Chaptered: 6/20/22
• Passed: 6/20/22

Caption

Allows eligible legislators to elect to receive per diem payments pursuant to an IRS-compliant accountable plan rather than as compensation

Impact

By enabling legislators to choose a travel allowance, HB 456 modifies how legislative compensation is structured, which could lead to significant administrative changes in the way per diem payments are managed. This adjustment primarily impacts those who travel long distances to fulfill their legislative duties, potentially improving their financial stipends while reducing tax implications. Legislators opting for this allowance will have to adhere to specific IRS regulations, which encourage proper documentation of travel expenses, thus fostering transparency and accountability in financial reporting.

Summary

House Bill 456, introduced by Representative Nelson, amends and reenacts the Louisiana Revised Statutes relating to the compensation of legislative members. The bill allows eligible legislators to elect to receive their per diem payments as non-taxable travel allowances under an accountable plan instead of as cash compensation. This approach aligns the per diem structure more closely with IRS regulations and may provide financial benefits for legislators who reside more than fifty miles from the state capital while attending legislative sessions. The change has the potential to enhance fiscal responsibility and compliance with federal tax laws regarding travel expenses.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 456 appears to be positive, with support among legislators who view it as a practical solution to improve compensation mechanisms for those traveling far to serve their constituents. The unanimous voting outcome—32 yeas and 0 nays during the final passage in the Senate—demonstrates a strong bipartisan consensus on the bill's utility and necessity. It appears that legislators recognize the importance of adapting compensation schemes to modern legal and financial standards.

Contention

While there is general support for the bill, discussions may arise regarding the implications of classifying per diem payments as travel allowances. Critics might argue that this could complicate existing legislative compensation paradigms or raise questions about the proper oversight of the accountable plans. Concerns might also be raised about the potential for misuse if compliance with IRS standards is not diligently maintained. As the bill brings administrative changes, ongoing monitoring of its impact on both legislators' finances and the public's perception of legislative accountability will be important.