Louisiana House Bill HCR47

Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/19/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Report Pass: 5/3/23
• Engrossed: 5/17/23
• Refer: 5/18/23

Caption

Suspends certain civil filing fee (RE DECREASE LF RV See Note)

Impact

The suspension of R.S. 13:4688 under HCR47 is expected to simplify civil court procedures and reduce financial burdens on litigants due to the elimination of processing fees. By halting the reporting requirements, the resolution seeks to address inefficiencies that have plagued the data collection process since its inception. The resolution is perceived as a necessary step toward enhancing the operational efficacy of the judicial system in Louisiana, as it provides the time needed for a comprehensive review and potential reform of the reporting mechanisms in place.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 47 (HCR47) aims to suspend the provisions of R.S. 13:4688, which mandates clerks of court to report information regarding actions for offenses and quasi-offenses to the judicial administrator of the Supreme Court of Louisiana. The resolution allows for the suspension of both the reporting requirements and associated processing fees, which effectively reduces civil filing fees. This suspension is intended to streamline the data collection process and will remain in effect until August 1, 2024.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR47 is largely positive among those who advocate for judicial efficiency and reduced financial strains on individuals entering the civil court system. Legislative discussions indicate a recognition of the previous challenges related to data collection under R.S. 13:4688. However, there may be concerns from administrative bodies about the implications of the temporary suspension and how it could affect future data analysis and reporting capabilities within the judicial system.

Contention

While HCR47 is expected to ease certain burdens, notable points of contention could arise regarding the temporary halt of data reporting and whether this may hinder the judicial administrator's ability to track and analyze civil lawsuits effectively. Critics could argue that suspending the reporting requirements delays necessary oversight and transparency in the judicial process. There may also be discussions about how the suspension aligns with long-term goals of data usage and potential tort reform within the state.