Louisiana 2024 2024 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB42 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR 
2024 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE 
 
 
This Note has been prepared by the Actuary for the Louisiana 
Legislative Auditor (LLA) with assistance from either the Fiscal Notes 
staff of the Legislative Auditor or staff of the Legislative Fiscal Office 
(LFO). The attachment of this Note provides compliance with the 
requirements of R.S. 24:521 as amended by Act 353 of the 2016 
Regular Session.  
 
 
 
 
 
Kenneth J. “Kenny” Herbold, ASA, EA, MAAA 
Director of Actuarial Services 
Louisiana Legislative Auditor 
 
Page 1 of 3 
 
Bill Header: RETIREMENT/MUNICIPAL POL:  Provides relative to membership in the Municipal Police Employees' Retirement 
System. 
 
Purpose of Bill:  
1) Increases Board membership from 15 to 16 members by increasing the number of mayors appointed by the Louisiana 
Municipal Association (LMA) from two to three and requires that at least one mayor shall be the mayor of a town or village. 
2) Provides that any action instituted by MPERS to recover delinquent payments or damages associated with delinquent payments 
is subject to a liberative prescription of three years and is subject to the Louisiana Governmental Claims Act. 
 
Cost Summary
1
: The estimated net actuarial and fiscal impact of the proposed legislation is summarized below.  
 
The expected change in the net actuarial present value of expected future benefits incurred by the retirement systems from the 
proposed law is estimated to be $0. A more detailed explanation can be found in Section I: Actuarial Impact on Retirement Systems.  
 
Net Fiscal Costs pertain to changes to all cash flows over the next five-year period including retirement system cash flows or cash flows 
related to local and state government entities.  
 
Administrative expenses are expected to increase to account for additional travel and training costs of four new trustees. To the extent 
delinquent payment collections are limited, employer contributions may increase over what they otherwise would have been but the net 
effect to the retirement system is $0 because this is shifting the cost from one local government entity (generally a non-participating 
entity) to the participating local government entities. 
 
In the following table, expenditures and revenues include cash flows to or from the affected retirement system (e.g. administrative 
expenses incurred by, benefit payments from, or contributions to the retirement system) and do not include administrative expenditures 
and revenues specifically incurred by the state or local government entities associated with implementing the legislation. A more detailed 
explanation can be found in Section II: Fiscal Impact on Retirement Systems. 
 
Five Year Net Fiscal Costs Pertaining to: 	Expenditures Revenues 
  The Retirement Systems  $ 46,250  $ 46,250 
  Local Government Entities 	46,250 	0 
  State Government Entities  0  0 
  Total  $ 92,500  $ 46,250 
 
In the following table, expenditures and revenues include administrative expenditures and revenues specifically incurred by the state or 
local government entities associated with implementing the legislation and do not include cash flows to or from the affected retirement 
system (i.e. contribution changes included in the above table). This information is provided by the LLA Local Government Services or 
the Legislative Fiscal Office. A more detailed explanation can be found in Sections III: Fiscal Impact on Local Government Entities and 
Section IV: Fiscal Impact on State Government Entities. 
 
Five Year Net Fiscal Costs Pertaining to: 	Expenditures Revenues 
  Local Government Entities  $ 0  $ 0 
  State Government Entities  0  0 
  Total  $ 0  $ 0 
  
                                                
1
 This is a different assessment from the actuarial cost requiring a 2/3
rd
 vote (refer to the section near the end of this Actuarial Note “Information 
Pertaining to La. Const. Art. X, §29(F)”). 
House Bill 42 HLS 24RS-131 	Date: April 8, 2024 
 
Engrossed 	Organizations Affected: MPERS 
Author: Firment and Butler 
LLA Note HB 42.02 	EG +$9,250 FC SG EX  2024 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 42
 
 
Page 2 of 3 
I. ACTUARIAL IMPACT ON RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 
 
This section of the actuarial note is intended to provide a brief outline of the changes in plan provisions and actuarial effect on key 
aspects of the affected retirement systems.   
 
The net change in actuarial present value of expected future benefits incurred by the retirement systems from proposed law is estimated 
to be $0.  
 
Administrative expenses are expected to increase to account for additional travel and training costs of four new trustees. Anticipated 
administrative costs are included as part of the development of the annual employer contribution, expressed as a percent of payroll. An 
additional $9,250 per year in administrative cost would not have a discernable effect on the development of the employer contribution 
rate. 
 
To the extent delinquent payment collections are limited, employer contributions may increase over what they otherwise would have 
been but the net effect to the retirement system is $0 because this is shifting the cost from one local government entity (generally a non-
participating entity) to the participating local government entities. 
 
 
II. FISCAL IMPACT ON RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 
 
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs (savings) associated with the retirement systems.  
 
Fiscal costs or savings include only cash flows to or from the affected retirement system (e.g. administrative expenses incurred by, 
benefit payments from, or contributions to the retirement system) and do not include administrative expenditures and revenues 
specifically incurred by the state or local government entities associated with implementing the legislation. A fiscal cost is denoted by 
“Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is denoted by 
“Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. 
 
Table A: Retirement System Fiscal Cost 
Expenditures 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-Year Total 
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 
Agy Self-Generated  9,250  9,250  9,250  9,250  9,250  46,250 
Stat Deds/Other 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Federal Funds 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Local Funds 9,250  9,250  9,250  9,250  9,250  46,250 
Annual Total $ 18,500 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 $ 92,500 
  
Revenues 	2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-Year Total 
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 
Agy Self-Generated  9,250  9,250  9,250  9,250  9,250  46,250 
Stat Deds/Other 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Federal Funds 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Local Funds 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Annual Total $ 9,250 $ 9,250 $ 9,250 $ 9,250 $ 9,250 $ 46,250 
 
Changes in employer contributions are reflected in the State General Fund and/or Local Fund expenditure lines above. The actual 
sources of funding (e.g., Federal Funds, State General Fund, etc.) may vary by employer and are not differentiated in the table. 
 
The proposed legislation is expected to have the following effects on retirement related fiscal costs and revenues during the five-
year measurement period. 
 
1. Agy Self-Generated expenditures are expected to increase to account for an increase in administrative costs associated with 
travel and training for one additional trustee. MPERS has estimated these costs to be approximately $9,250 per year for a single 
trustee ($5,250 in per diem calculated based on the actual mileage. Hotel, and meal reimbursement for the current trustee that 
travels the farthest plus $4,000 for educational conferences). 
2. MPERS has also indicated they do not have sufficient seating or space for additional trustees which could result in potential 
one-time construction costs to renovate the board room or on-going costs to find and utilize an appropriate meeting space. This 
is not considered a direct cost of the bill. 
3. Any increase in administrative expenses has a corresponding increase in employer contributions which is reflected above as 
Local Funds expenditures and Agy Self-Generated revenues. 
 
 
III. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES 
(Prepared by LLA Local Government Services) 
 
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs (savings) related to administrative expenditures and revenue impacts 
incurred by local government entities other than those included in Table A.  
 
The proposed legislation is not expected to have any additional effects on fiscal administrative costs and revenues related to local 
government entities during the five-year measurement period, other than those outlined above. 
 
 
IV. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES 
(Prepared by Legislative Fiscal Office) 
 
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs (savings) related to administrative expenditures and revenue impacts 
incurred by state government entities other than those included in Table A.  
 
N/A - This bill only impacts local government, and therefore, has no state impact. The LFO does not review local government bills.  2024 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 42
 
 
Page 3 of 3 
V. ACTUARIAL DISCLOSURES 
 
Intended Use 
 
This actuarial note is based on our understanding of the bill as of the date shown above. It is intended to be used by the legislature during 
the current legislative session only and assumes no other legislative changes affecting the funding or benefits of the affected systems, 
other than those identified, will be adopted. Other readers of this actuarial note are advised to seek professional guidance as to its content 
and interpretation, and not to rely upon this communication without such guidance. The actuarial note, and any referenced documents, 
should be read as a whole. Distribution of, or reliance on, only parts of this actuarial note could result in its misuse and may mislead 
others. The summary of the impact of the bill included in this actuarial note is for the purposes of an actuarial analysis only, as required 
by La. R.S. 24:521, and is not a legal interpretation of the provisions of the bill.  
 
Actuarial Data, Methods and Assumptions 
 
Unless indicated otherwise, this actuarial note was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and assumptions as disclosed in the most 
recent actuarial valuation report adopted by the Public Retirement Systems’ Actuarial Committee (PRSAC). The assumptions and 
methods are reasonable for the purpose of this analysis.  
 
To the extent that this actuarial note relies on calculations performed by the retirement systems’ actuaries, to the best of our knowledge, no 
material biases exist with respect to the data, methods or assumptions used to develop the analysis other than those specifically identified. 
We did not audit the information provided, but have reviewed the information for reasonableness and consistency with other information 
provided by or for the affected retirement systems.   
 
Conflict of Interest 
 
There is nothing in the proposed legislation that will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of 
actuarial opinion. 
 
Risks Associated with Measuring Costs 
 
This actuarial note is an actuarial communication, and is required to include certain disclosures in compliance with Actuarial Standards 
of Practice (ASOP) No. 51. Risk disclosures otherwise required by ASOP No. 51 do not apply to this actuarial note because the proposed 
bill does not significantly change the types or levels of risks of the retirement system. 
  
Certification 
 
Kenneth J. Herbold is an Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA), a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA), and 
an Enrolled Actuary (EA) under the Employees Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Mr. Herbold meets the US Qualification 
Standards necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. 
 
 
VI. LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURAL ITEMS 
 
Information Pertaining to La. Const. Art. X, §29(F) 
 
☐ This bill contains a retirement system benefit provision having an actuarial cost.  
 
 No member of a retirement system could receive a larger benefit with the enactment of this bill than what they would have 
received without this bill. 
 
 
 
Dual Referral Relative to Total Fiscal Costs or Total Cash Flows: 
 
The information presented below is based on information contained in Sections II, III, and IV for the first three years following the 2024 
Regular Session. 
 
 Senate 	House 
 
 ☐ 13.5.1 Applies to Senate or House Instruments ☐ 6.8F Applies to Senate or House Instruments 
   If an annual fiscal cost ≥ $100,000, then bill is   If an annual General Fund fiscal cost ≥ $100,000, then 
   dual referred to:   bill is dual referred to: 
   Dual Referral: Senate Finance   Dual Referral: Appropriations 
 
 ☐ 13.5.2 Applies to Senate or House Instruments ☐ 6.8G Applies to Senate Instruments only 
   If an annual tax or fee change ≥ $500,000, then   If a net fee decrease occurs or is an increase in annual 
   bill is dual referred to:   fees and taxes ≥ $500,000, then bill is dual referred to: 
   Dual Referral: Revenue and Fiscal Affairs  Dual Referral: Ways and Means