Louisiana House Bill HB788

Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/24
• Refer: 3/27/24
• Report Pass: 4/8/24
• Engrossed: 4/15/24
• Refer: 4/16/24
• Report Pass: 5/6/24
• Enrolled: 5/20/24
• Chaptered: 5/28/24
• Passed: 5/28/24

Caption

Relative to the Hurricane Ida Recovery Fund (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The amendments brought by HB788 are expected to enhance the state's response to the aftermath of Hurricane Ida by clarifying the usage of the Recovery Fund. This includes expanding the eligibility of entities that can receive funds, focusing on public use and community-serving facilities. The legislative intent is to ensure that those impacted by the hurricane have greater access to necessary resources for restoring and rebuilding their properties, which could significantly aid in recovery efforts in affected areas.

Summary

House Bill 788 aims to amend and reenact R.S. 39:100.171(C), concerning the Hurricane Ida Recovery Fund. The bill provides detailed criteria for allocating funds to eligible entities that suffered property loss or damage due to Hurricane Ida. These funds are designated for full or partial payments to entities that have not been fully compensated by insurance or other federal and state resources. This includes provisions for various types of facilities, such as public buildings, mixed-use facilities, and nonprofit entities that serve the general public.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB788 appears to be supportive among legislators, as indicated by the unanimous passage (36-0) during the Senate vote for final passage. Proponents view the bill as a vital provision for providing timely support to communities recovering from disasters. The absence of opposition suggests a consensus on the necessity of the bill, reflecting a commitment to aiding recovery efforts and building resilience against future disasters.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB788 may include the scope of eligibility and the allocation process, as discussions often arise regarding the fairness and efficacy of disaster relief funds. Critics may argue that not all entities or regions receive equal emphasis, raising concerns about equitable distribution. Additionally, the ongoing dialogue about federal versus state roles in disaster relief could lend itself to potential future debates as the recovery process unfolds.