Provides relative to required high-dosage tutoring for certain students. (8/1/24) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
The implementation of SB 508 is set to significantly impact educational practices across the state. By legally requiring the provision of high-dosage tutoring, the bill addresses student performance disparities and introduces a structured approach to academic support. Local school boards will need to comply with state Department of Education guidelines in selecting approved tutoring providers and in creating tailored academic support plans that respond to student performance data.
Senate Bill 508 aims to provide enhanced academic support through high-dosage tutoring for students in grades kindergarten through five who have not achieved mastery in reading or math. The bill mandates local school boards to develop educational plans using federal funds to implement these tutoring services effectively. The tutoring programs are expected to foster significant improvements in students' academic performance, guided by high-quality instructional materials and delivery methods tailored to meet the diverse needs of students.
The sentiment around SB 508 appears to be generally positive among education reform advocates who see the bill as a crucial step toward addressing the needs of underperforming students. Supporters argue that expanding access to high-quality tutoring can bridge educational gaps, especially post-pandemic. However, there may be concerns regarding funding and the execution of these programs, particularly among local educators who question the sufficiency of federal resources to support expansive tutoring initiatives.
While many support the intent behind SB 508, contention arises concerning its implementation and sustainability, primarily around funding requirements and the efficacy of high-dosage tutoring models. Critics argue that relying on federal funds, especially those tied to emergency relief, may not provide a long-term solution for ongoing educational support. Additionally, the requirement for a structured reporting mechanism may create additional administrative burdens for local school districts, raising concerns about potential compliance challenges.