Louisiana Senate Bill SR179

Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/3/24
• Passed: 6/3/24

Caption

Requests appointment of a committee to notify the governor that the legislature is ready to adjourn sine die.

Impact

The impact of SR179 on state laws is primarily procedural. By facilitating the formal adjournment of the legislature, the resolution ensures that the state can efficiently close out its legislative business for the session. This act of adjourning is crucial as it marks the end of formal legislative activities and the initiation of any actions the governor may wish to take following the adjournment. The resolution does not alter any existing laws but rather underscores the process for legislative closure in Louisiana.

Summary

Senate Resolution 179, introduced by Senator Barrow, serves to formalize the process for the Louisiana legislature to declare its readiness to adjourn sine die. This resolution calls for the appointment of a committee consisting of five senators and a corresponding committee from the House of Representatives. The purpose of these committees is to officially notify the governor that the legislature has completed its labors for the session and is ready to conclude its activities. SR179 is an administrative measure, central to the legislative process but lacking in substantial policy implications.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR179 is largely neutral, as it is a standard procedure that does not spark significant contention or debate among legislators. Being an essential part of the legislative process, the resolution is expected to pass with little opposition, reflecting a consensus among members about the completion of legislative business for the session. The procedural nature of SR179 means that it is seldom subject to extensive scrutiny or passionate opinions.

Contention

Notable points of contention typically arise in discussions surrounding more substantive policy legislation, and as such, SR179 does not present significant areas of debate. The resolution is a routine procedural matter, and while individual legislators may have personal opinions about the timing or efficiency of the adjournment process, SR179 itself does not introduce divisive issues. Therefore, discussions are likely to focus more on logistical arrangements rather than the content or implications of the resolution itself.