Louisiana 2025 2025 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB8 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR 
2025 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE 
 
 
This Note has been prepared by the Actuary for the Louisiana 
Legislative Auditor (LLA) with assistance from either the Fiscal Notes 
staff of the Legislative Auditor or staff of the Legislative Fiscal Office 
(LFO). The attachment of this Note provides compliance with the 
requirements of R.S. 24:521 as amended by Act 353 of the 2016 
Regular Session.  
 
 
 
 
 
Kenneth J. “Kenny” Herbold, ASA, EA, MAAA 
Director of Actuarial Services 
Louisiana Legislative Auditor 
 
Page 1 of 3 
 
Bill Header: RETIREMENT SYSTEMS:  Provides relative to membership in the Municipal Employees' Retirement System 
 
Purpose of Bill: Proposed law allows a member in the Municipal Employees’ Retirement System MERS) with at least 5 years of vesting 
service who becomes employed in a position covered by the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS) after December 
31, 2024 to remain in MERS rather than participate in LASERS. 
 
Summary of Impact
1
: The estimated net actuarial and fiscal impact of the proposed legislation is summarized below.  
 
Proposed law is expected to have minimal immediate or long-term impact on the net actuarial present value of expected future benefits 
and administrative expenses incurred by the retirement systems A more detailed explanation can be found in Section I: Actuarial Impact 
on Retirement Systems.  
 
Net Fiscal Costs pertain to changes to all cash flows over the next five-year period including retirement system cash flows or cash flows 
related to local and state government entities.  
 
In the following table, expenditures and revenues include cash flows to or from the affected retirement system (e.g. administrative 
expenses incurred by, benefit payments from, or contributions to the retirement system) and do not include administrative expenditures 
and revenues specifically incurred by the state or local government entities associated with implementing the legislation. A more detailed 
explanation can be found in Section II: Fiscal Impact on Retirement Systems. 
 
Five Year Net Fiscal Costs Pertaining to:  Expenditures  Revenues 
  The Retirement Systems   See Section II   See Section II 
  Local Government Entities 	See Section II 	0 
  State Government Entities   See Section II   0 
  Total   See Section II   See Section II 
 
In the following table, expenditures and revenues include administrative expenditures and revenues specifically incurred by the state or 
local government entities associated with implementing the legislation and do not include cash flows to or from the affected retirement 
system (i.e. contribution changes included in the above table). This information is provided by the LLA Local Government Services or 
the Legislative Fiscal Office. A more detailed explanation can be found in Sections III: Fiscal Impact on Local Government Entities and 
Section IV: Fiscal Impact on State Government Entities. 
 
Five Year Net Fiscal Costs Pertaining to:  Expenditures  Revenues 
  Local Government Entities  $ 0  $ 0 
  State Government Entities  0  0 
  Total  $ 0  $ 0 
 
  
                                                
1
 This is a different assessment from the actuarial cost requiring a 2/3
rd
 vote (refer to the section near the end of this Actuarial Note “Information 
Pertaining to La. Const. Art. X, §29(F)”). 
House Bill 8 HLS 25RS-385 	Date: April 8, 2025 
 
Original 	Organizations Affected: LASERS & 
Author: Glorioso  MERS 
LLA Note HB 7.01 	OR SEE ACTUARIAL NOTE FC  2025 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 8
 
 
Page 2 of 3 
I. ACTUARIAL IMPACT ON RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 
 
This section of the actuarial note is intended to provide a brief outline of the changes in plan provisions and actuarial effect on key 
aspects of the affected retirement systems.   
 
Proposed law will result in some individuals who would otherwise participate in LASERS to, instead, remain in MERS. In general, this 
would decrease total contributions to LASERS while increasing total contributions to MERS. Depending on the facts and circumstances 
of each individual case, costs could be higher or lower for each retirement system. However, in the aggregate, the net result is expected 
to be minimal over both the short- and long-term. 
 
II. FISCAL IMPACT ON RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 
 
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs (savings) associated with the retirement systems.  
 
Fiscal costs or savings include only cash flows to or from the affected retirement system (e.g. administrative expenses incurred by, 
benefit payments from, or contributions to the retirement system) and do not include administrative expenditures and revenues 
specifically incurred by the state or local government entities associated with implementing the legislation. A fiscal cost is denoted by 
“Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is denoted by 
“Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. 
 
Table A: Retirement System Fiscal Cost 
Expenditures 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 5-Year Total 
State General Fund  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below 
Agy Self-Generated  See below  0  0  0  0  0 
Stat Deds/Other 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Federal Funds 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Local Funds See below  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below 
Annual Total See below  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below 
  
Revenues 	2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 5-Year Total 
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 
Agy Self-Generated  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below 
Stat Deds/Other 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Federal Funds 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Local Funds 0  0  0  0  0  0 
Annual Total See below  See below  See below  See below  See below  See below 
 
Changes in employer contributions are reflected in the State General Fund and/or Local Fund expenditure lines above. The actual 
sources of funding (e.g., Federal Funds, State General Fund, etc.) may vary by employer and are not differentiated in the table. 
 
The proposed legislation is expected to have the following effects on retirement related fiscal costs and revenues during the five-
year measurement period. 
 
1. Expenditures: 
 
a. To the extent an individual(s) remains a MERS participant, rather than  participate in LASERS, the member’s employer 
will be remit contributions at the MERS contribution rate as opposed to the LASERS contribution rate. This will generate 
higher expenditures for the employer (identified as State General Funds above) when MERS’ employer rate exceeds 
LASERS’ rate and the opposite when MERS’ employer rate is lower than LASERS’ rate. Currently, MERS’ employer 
rate is lower than LASERS’ rate.  
b. To the extent an individual(s) who was previously a MERS participant that accepted a LASERS covered position after 
December 31, 2024 and before the enactment of proposed law, elects to participate in MERS instead of LASERS, LASERS 
expenditures would increase for the 2025-26 FY to account for the transfer of contributions received by LASERS. This 
amount is not expected to be material. 
 
2. Revenues: 
 
For any individual(s) who remain in MERS rather than becoming members of LASERS,  employer contributions (Agy Self-
Generated revenues) to LASERS would decrease and employer contributions to MERS would increase under proposed law 
when compared with expectations under current law. However, any differences in total contributions are not expected to be 
material. 
 
III. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES 
 
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs (savings) related to administrative expenditures and revenue impacts 
incurred by local government entities other than those included in Section II.  
 
The proposed legislation is not expected to have any additional effects on fiscal administrative costs and revenues related to local 
government entities during the five-year measurement period, other than those outlined above. 
 
IV. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES 
(Prepared by Legislative Fiscal Office) 
 
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs (savings) related to administrative expenditures and revenue impacts 
incurred by state government entities other than those included in Section II.  
 
Other than the impact on employer contribution rates which is already reflected in Section II above, there is no anticipated direct material 
effect on governmental expenditures and revenues as a result of this measure.  2025 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 8
 
 
Page 3 of 3 
V. ACTUARIAL DISCLOSURES 
 
Intended Use 
 
This actuarial note is based on our understanding of the bill as of the date shown above. It is intended to be used by the legislature during 
the current legislative session only and assumes no other legislative changes affecting the funding or benefits of the affected systems, 
other than those identified, will be adopted. Other readers of this actuarial note are advised to seek professional guidance as to its content 
and interpretation, and not to rely upon this communication without such guidance. The actuarial note, and any referenced documents, 
should be read as a whole. Distribution of, or reliance on, only parts of this actuarial note could result in its misuse and may mislead 
others. The summary of the impact of the bill included in this actuarial note is for the purposes of an actuarial analysis only, as required 
by La. R.S. 24:521, and is not a legal interpretation of the provisions of the bill.  
 
Actuarial Data, Methods and Assumptions 
 
Unless indicated otherwise, this actuarial note was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and assumptions as disclosed in the most 
recent actuarial valuation report adopted by the Public Retirement Systems’ Actuarial Committee (PRSAC). The assumptions and 
methods are reasonable for the purpose of this analysis.  
 
For certain calculations that may be presented herein, we have utilized commercially available valuation software and/or are relying on 
proprietary valuation models and related software developed by our actuarial contractor.  We made a reasonable attempt to understand the 
intended purpose of, general operation of, major sensitivities and dependencies within, and key strengths and limitations of these models.  
In our professional judgment, the models have the capability to provide results that are consistent with the purposes of the analysis and have 
no material limitations or known weaknesses. Tests were performed to ensure that the model reasonably represents that which is intended 
to be modeled.   
 
To the extent that this actuarial note relies on calculations performed by the retirement systems’ actuaries, to the best of our knowledge, no 
material biases exist with respect to the data, methods or assumptions used to develop the analysis other than those specifically identified. 
We did not audit the information provided, but have reviewed the information for reasonableness and consistency with other information 
provided by or for the affected retirement systems.   
 
Conflict of Interest 
 
Employees of the LLA are members of LASERS, however, there is nothing in the proposed legislation that will compromise the signing 
actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of actuarial opinion. 
 
Risks Associated with Measuring Costs 
 
This actuarial note is an actuarial communication, and is required to include certain disclosures in compliance with Actuarial Standards 
of Practice (ASOP) No. 51. Risk disclosures otherwise required by ASOP No. 51 do not apply to this actuarial note because the proposed 
bill does not significantly change the types or levels of risks of the retirement system. 
  
Certification 
 
Kenneth J. Herbold is an Associate of the Society of Actuaries (ASA), a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA), and 
an Enrolled Actuary (EA) under the Employees Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Mr. Herbold meets the US Qualification 
Standards necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. 
 
 
VI. LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURAL ITEMS 
 
Information Pertaining to La. Const. Art. X, §29(F) 
 
☒ This bill contains a retirement system benefit provision having an actuarial cost.  
 
 Some members of a retirement system could receive a larger benefit with the enactment of this bill than what they would have 
received without this bill. 
 
Dual Referral Relative to Total Fiscal Costs or Total Cash Flows: 
 
The information presented below is based on information contained in Sections II, III, and IV for the first three years following the 2025 
Regular Session. 
 
 Senate 	House 
 
 ☐ 13.5.1 Applies to Senate or House Instruments ☐ 6.8F Applies to Senate or House Instruments 
   If an annual fiscal cost ≥ $100,000, then bill is   If an annual General Fund fiscal cost ≥ $100,000, then 
   dual referred to:   bill is dual referred to: 
   Dual Referral: Senate Finance   Dual Referral: Appropriations 
 
 ☐ 13.5.2 Applies to Senate or House Instruments ☐ 6.8G Applies to Senate Instruments only 
   If an annual tax or fee change ≥ $500,000, then   If a net fee decrease occurs or is an increase in annual 
   bill is dual referred to:   fees and taxes ≥ $500,000, then bill is dual referred to: 
   Dual Referral: Revenue and Fiscal Affairs  Dual Referral: Ways and Means