Louisiana Senate Bill SB52

Louisiana 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/1/25
• Refer: 4/1/25
• Refer: 4/14/25
• Report Pass: 4/22/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Engrossed: 5/5/25
• Refer: 5/6/25
• Report Pass: 5/19/25
• Enrolled: 5/29/25
• Chaptered: 6/4/25
• Passed: 6/4/25

Caption

Provide an individual income tax exemption for grants from the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program. (gov sig) (EN -$828,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB52 is expected to have significant implications for state tax laws concerning disaster recovery and home improvement funding. By clearly defining the treatment of grants received under the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program, the bill establishes a tax framework that supports individuals who take proactive measures to reinforce their homes against natural disasters. This move could lead to increased participation in the program, ultimately contributing to the resilience and safety of communities across Louisiana.

Summary

Senate Bill 52 proposes an individual income tax exemption for grants received from the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program, effective January 1, 2025. This legislation aims to alleviate the tax burden on individuals receiving financial assistance through the program, which is designed to improve resilience against disasters and ensure safer home environments. By exempting these grant amounts from taxable income, the bill encourages homeowners to utilize resources for home fortification projects that can enhance disaster recovery and preparedness.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding SB52 appears to be positive, with broad support noted in the legislative process. The tax exemption is viewed as a beneficial step toward supporting homeowners in improving their properties against vulnerabilities posed by natural disasters. However, as with many fiscal legislative proposals, discussions may have included concerns regarding the long-term financial impacts on state revenue and how exemptions would affect overall funding for other essential state services.

Contention

While the bill passed with unanimous support, there could still be contention surrounding its implementation and the specifics of grant allocation. Some stakeholders might express concerns about the adequacy of oversight and evaluation of the program to ensure that funds are used effectively. Additionally, the fiscal impact of the bill, estimated at a reduction of $828,000 in general fund revenue, may raise questions during discussions about budgetary constraints and priorities within the state government.