Texas House Bill HB1807

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to alternative times of possession under a standard possession order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

Impact

The changes proposed in HB 1807 would directly modify existing guidelines surrounding child custody and possession issues. By allowing conservators to make an election for expanded possession times, the bill aims to promote flexible arrangements that can better suit the logistical realities of modern parenting. The impact of this bill would be significant in any custody hearing or negotiating phase, as it provides a clearer and potentially more beneficial structure for determining child possession times, aligning with the evolving understanding of shared parenting in Texas.

Summary

House Bill 1807 seeks to amend the Family Code of Texas by introducing an expanded standard possession order in cases affecting the parent-child relationship. The bill allows conservators to elect alternative times for possession, which can potentially result in increased time spent with the child, contingent upon a court's determination that such an arrangement is in the best interest of the child. This legislative effort is primarily aimed at accommodating the varying needs of parents and children, particularly in situations where standard possession orders may not serve the familial dynamics effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1807 appears to be largely supportive among family law advocates and parents who seek more adaptable visitation schedules. Proponents view this bill as a constructive step towards modernizing family law to reflect current societal norms about parental involvement. However, there are concerns expressed by some parties related to the interpretation of what constitutes the 'best interest of the child,' and how that may be applied inconsistently in custody cases, potentially leading to disputes over the effectiveness of the expanded possession order process.

Contention

One notable point of contention with HB 1807 involves the balance between flexibility in parenting time and safeguarding the welfare of children. Critics worry that while the intentions of the bill are positive, the subjective nature of determining the 'best interest of the child' could lead to unequal access to parenting time. This concern suggests a possible divergence in judicial interpretation, which could affect how the law is implemented, and ultimately how children experience custody arrangements.