Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1904

Caption

Relating to withdrawals of water from the Edwards Aquifer to supply a military installation.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1904 would significantly alter existing regulations on groundwater withdrawals by exempting certain military operations from the typical permitting processes. This change could streamline water access for military facilities, potentially improving operational efficiency. However, it might also raise concerns regarding the sustainability of the Edwards Aquifer and the potential implications for local water resources. By allowing this exemption, the bill seeks to balance the demands of military readiness with ecological oversight, although some might question if the protective measures are sufficient.

Summary

House Bill 1904 addresses the regulations surrounding the withdrawals of groundwater from the Edwards Aquifer specifically for the purpose of supplying military installations. The bill permits a municipally owned utility in San Antonio to withdraw water from the aquifer without requiring a permit, provided that the water is used for various military needs, such as human consumption, irrigation, and operational support. To mitigate any environmental impacts, the bill mandates that the military must enter into a contract that ensures it reduces its own groundwater withdrawals by an equivalent amount to what it receives from the utility.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1904 appears to favor the bill among its supporters, particularly for its intended benefits to military operations in Texas. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary response to ensure that military installations have adequate water supplies, especially for missions that rely heavily on consistent water availability. Critics, however, may express reservations about the implications for environmental management and local water rights, suggesting that the bill could pave the way for increased water extraction that might compromise the aquifer's integrity.

Contention

Key points of contention related to HB 1904 center on the intersection of military needs and environmental stewardship. Critics of the bill may argue that providing exemptions for groundwater withdrawals could lead to over-extraction and negatively impact local ecosystems and community water supplies. Additionally, there may be concerns about transparency in the contract process between the utility and military installations, as well as the adequacy of existing federal regulations intended to protect the aquifer’s water sources.

Companion Bills

TX SB881

Same As Relating to withdrawals of water from the Edwards Aquifer to supply a military installation.

Previously Filed As

TX HB1646

Relating to the use of water withdrawn from the Edwards Aquifer.

TX SB2379

Relating to aquifer storage and recovery projects that transect a portion of the Edwards Aquifer.

TX HB3995

Relating to the regulatory authority of certain counties to protect the operations of military installations.

TX SB1308

Relating to the operation of an unmanned aircraft over an airport or military installation; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB2365

Relating to the operation of an unmanned aircraft over an airport or military installation; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB1068

Relating to the construction of a meteorological tower near a federally owned or operated radar installation or military installation; providing an administrative penalty.

TX SB1745

Relating to the equalization of the rates of production fees charged on certain wells by the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer Conservation District; authorizing an increase in the rate of the fee.

TX HB5279

Relating to a prohibition on interbasin transfers of state water.

TX SB594

Relating to requirements for and charges for service from public drinking water supply systems.

TX HB4623

Relating to the consideration of water markets in the regional water planning process.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.