Connecticut House Bill HB05117

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/10
• Refer: 2/10/10
• Report Pass: 3/5/10
• Refer: 3/16/10
• Report Pass: 3/23/10
• Refer: 4/5/10
• Report Pass: 4/7/10
• Refer: 4/9/10
• Report Pass: 4/12/10
• Engrossed: 4/22/10
• Report Pass: 4/26/10
• Chaptered: 5/13/10
• Enrolled: 5/18/10
• Passed: 5/26/10

Caption

An Act Concerning Conservation And Preservation Restrictions Held By The State.

Impact

The bill facilitates a structured approach to managing land use in areas designated for conservation or preservation, giving both local governance and state agencies a framework for oversight. Should municipalities fail to adhere to these regulations, the Attorney General is permitted to enforce compliance through legal actions. This statutorily supported enforcement represents a proactive measure to uphold conservation commitments, but it also places additional responsibilities on municipal entities to comply with new documentation and notification requirements.

Summary

House Bill 05117 is an Act concerning conservation and preservation restrictions held by the state. The bill aims to establish clearer guidelines for municipalities regarding permit applications on properties that hold such restrictions. It requires applicants to provide written notice to the holder of the conservation or preservation restriction at least sixty days prior to filing a permit application with any state or local land use agency. This provision seeks to ensure that any land use proposed does not violate the terms of the existing restrictions, thereby reinforcing the importance of conservation efforts within state jurisdiction.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 05117 seems to be largely supportive among conservation advocates who view it as a necessary step in protecting sensitive lands from inappropriate development. However, there may be concerns from municipal officials about the administrative burden placed upon them to comply with the new requirements. The balance between protecting land and efficiently managing local development is a nuanced conversation reflected in the discussions surrounding this bill.

Contention

A notable point of contention may arise from the civil penalties outlined for violations of the bill’s provisions. Specifically, penalties could amount to $5,000 for failing to comply with notification requirements and $1,000 for each day of continued violation. Critics may argue that these financial implications pose a challenge to municipalities already operating under financial constraints. The enforcement of stringent regulations raises questions about the feasibility of compliance for smaller municipalities versus larger cities with more comprehensive resources.