Louisiana House Bill HB156

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 3/30/10
• Engrossed: 4/7/10
• Report Pass: 6/9/10
• Enrolled: 6/17/10
• Chaptered: 6/25/10
• Passed: 6/25/10

Caption

Re-creates certain entities transferred to or placed within the office of the governor (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

HB156 is designed to clarify and continue the existence of key regulatory bodies in Louisiana, thereby ensuring that essential state functions remain operational. By re-creating these agencies, the bill seeks to provide structure and continuity in state governance, particularly regarding professional licensing and regulatory oversight. This move is part of maintaining a consistent approach to governance and regulation in essential sectors, ultimately reinforcing the operational capabilities of the governor’s office and related agencies.

Summary

House Bill 156 focuses on the re-creation of several agencies that are transferred to or placed within the office of the governor. This bill aims to reinstate the statutory authority and existence of these agencies, which include various regulatory boards such as the Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology, the Louisiana Real Estate Commission, and the Louisiana State Racing Commission. The effective date for this re-creation is set for June 30, 2010, with provisions for potential further re-creations prior to a specified termination date in 2015.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB156 appears to be largely pragmatic, with legislators recognizing the need for a stable regulatory environment. While there was some concern about the long-term sustainability of these agencies beyond the legislatively stipulated dates, supporters believe that re-creating these agencies is necessary to avoid gaps in oversight and enforcement. Overall, the discussion seemed aligned with the need for the proper functioning of state governance rather than polarizing debates, suggesting a collaborative approach among legislators.

Contention

One point of contention within the context of HB156 relates to the inherent complexity and potential bureaucratic implications of combining various regulatory entities under the governor's auspices. Some legislators expressed concerns about efficiency and the possibility of diminished local responsiveness as agencies are centralized. However, the prevailing argument for the bill was centered on the necessity of ensuring that regulatory functions remain uninterrupted and sufficiently supported by the state government.