Provides with respect to earning pre-conviction "good time" diminution of sentence (OR DECREASE GF EX See Note)
Under this bill, individuals in custody would be able to earn a reduction in their detention time at a rate of thirty days for every thirty days spent in custody, unless they are charged with a violent crime, in which case the earning rate would be reduced. The determination of how much good time an individual earns would be under the jurisdiction of the parish sheriff or the superintendent of the correctional facility, further delineating authority and accountability in the sentence reduction process.
House Bill 167 seeks to amend existing provisions related to the earning of 'good time' credits for individuals awaiting prosecution or sentencing in parish prisons. Specifically, it introduces the concept of 'pre-conviction good time', allowing these individuals to earn credits towards the reduction of their sentences based on demonstrated good behavior and participation in self-improvement activities while in custody. This is a significant modification of the current law that primarily addresses good time for convicted defendants and aims to incentivize positive behavior even prior to formal conviction.
The general sentiment towards HB 167 appears to be cautiously optimistic, as it promotes rehabilitation and incentivizes good behavior among those in the justice system. Proponents suggest that this approach not only eases the burden on overcrowded facilities but also aligns with contemporary views regarding the treatment of individuals in pretrial detention. Critics, however, may raise concerns about the application of discretion by sheriffs and superintendents, potentially leading to inconsistencies in implementation.
Notable points of contention around the bill might revolve around its implications for those accused of violent crimes, who are treated differently under this proposed law by accruing good time at a slower rate. Additionally, the bill might provoke debates about the potential for abuse or biased discretion in determining pre-conviction good time, which could impact the fairness of the justice system. The balance between encouraging rehabilitation through incentives and ensuring fairness in judicial processes is central to the discussion on this bill.