Louisiana House Bill HB747

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Engrossed: 6/7/10
• Refer: 6/15/10
• Report Pass: 6/16/10
• Enrolled: 6/21/10
• Chaptered: 7/8/10
• Passed: 7/8/10

Caption

Relative to the Harbor Police Retirement System (Port of New Orleans), provides that persons retired from other systems are eligible for membership from their date of hire (EN +$233,000 APV)

Impact

The implications of this bill are significant for state laws governing retirement systems. By allowing additional membership eligibility, it acknowledges the contributions of a broader range of public servants, potentially increasing the size and financial stability of the Harbor Police Retirement System. The bill is anticipated to have a positive impact on the retirement security of eligible employees, ensuring they receive benefits commensurate with their service duration in public employment.

Summary

House Bill 747 seeks to amend the Harbor Police Retirement System (Port of New Orleans) by extending eligibility for membership to certain retirees from other public retirement systems. This change allows those who were barred initially from joining the Harbor Police system due to retirement from another system to prospectively become members from their date of hire, given they meet other requirements. This amendment aims to create a more inclusive retirement framework for public employees who have served in various capacities within the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 747 appears to be supportive, especially among groups advocating for public sector employees. Stakeholders recognize the importance of extending retirement benefits to those who have served under different systems, thereby enhancing benefits accessibility. However, financial implications of these changes may raise concerns regarding the sustainability of the Harbor Police Retirement System, necessitating careful fiscal oversight as the bill progresses.

Contention

While support for the measure exists, there may still be points of contention regarding the financial impact on the retirement system. Critics could argue about the long-term economic viability of expanding eligibility, especially given the potential increase in liabilities for the retirement fund. The discussion may revolve around balancing fairness and inclusivity for retired public workers with the fiscal responsibility required to maintain the retirement system's health.