Louisiana House Bill HB898

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/14/10
• Engrossed: 4/26/10
• Report Pass: 5/18/10
• Enrolled: 6/3/10
• Chaptered: 6/8/10
• Passed: 6/8/10

Caption

Re-creates the Department of Environmental Quality

Impact

The implications of HB 898 are significant for state laws governing environmental management in Louisiana. By re-creating the Department and its statutory entities, the bill secures their operational authority until a specified termination date, which is set for July 1, 2015. The proposed legislation may affect how environmental regulations are implemented and adjusted over time, providing a framework for addressing evolving environmental challenges within the state. It reinforces the state's regulatory structure, ensuring that environmental protections do not lapse due to legislative inaction.

Summary

House Bill 898 aims to re-create the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and its associated statutory entities. The bill outlines the effective termination date for the statutory authority governing these entities, establishing a timeline for their continued existence and operation. This legislative move reflects an ongoing commitment to maintaining state-level environmental oversight while detailing processes for future re-creations, ensuring that the state's environmental policies remain enforced and updated as necessary.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 898 appears to be supportive among proponents who view re-creating the Department of Environmental Quality as vital for effective environmental governance. Supporters argue that maintaining an active, functioning department is essential to safeguard public health and the environment. However, there could be skepticism among some stakeholders who question the need for re-creation versus possible reforms within existing frameworks, raising discussions about efficiency and the management of environmental concerns.

Contention

Potential points of contention regarding HB 898 may include debates over the adequacy of current policies and regulations enforced by the Department of Environmental Quality. Some critics might argue that merely re-creating the Department does not address deeper systemic issues, such as funding, resource allocation, or administrative efficacy. Furthermore, discussions over transparency and public engagement in environmental decision-making could emerge, as stakeholders seek assurance that the Department remains accountable to the communities it serves.