Louisiana Senate Bill SB316

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/18/10

Caption

Prohibits the district attorney and assistant district attorneys of the 16th Judicial District from using governmental resources for their private law practices. (8/15/10)

Impact

The enactment of SB 316 is intended to strengthen the ethical standards governing district attorneys in Louisiana, specifically within the 16th Judicial District. By forbidding the use of governmental resources for private legal matters, the bill seeks to enhance the accountability of public officials and fortify public trust in the legal system. This could potentially set a precedent for similar legislative actions across other jurisdictions, aiming to eliminate conflicts of interest and promote ethical legal practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 316, proposed by Senator Hebert, introduces a significant ethical guideline by prohibiting the district attorney and assistant district attorneys of the 16th Judicial District from utilizing governmental resources in their private legal practices. This stipulation aims to ensure that public resources are not misappropriated for personal gain, thereby upholding the integrity of public office and the legal profession. The bill is set to take effect on August 15, 2010, if passed, reflecting a proactive approach to legal ethics within the district attorney's office.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 316 is largely supportive, particularly among legal ethics advocates who view the bill as a necessary measure to curb potential abuses of power. During discussions, proponents emphasized the importance of ethical behavior among public officials while critics, if any, may argue about the potential challenges of enforcement and implications for district attorneys managing dual responsibilities. Overall, there seems to be a consensus that this is a step toward cleaner governance.

Contention

While SB 316 appears to have broad support, there may be points of contention regarding its implementation. Questions about monitoring compliance and the practicalities of enforcing the prohibition on using governmental resources could arise. Additionally, some may debate what constitutes 'governmental resources' and how the bill will impact the existing legal obligations of district attorneys who may also have private practices.