Louisiana Senate Bill SB370

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Prohibits a person appointed to fill a vacancy in the office of lieutenant governor when the unexpired term exceeds one year from being a candidate in the election to fill the remainder of the term. (gov sig)

Impact

Should SB370 be enacted, it would fundamentally alter the process by which vacancies in the office of lieutenant governor are handled in Louisiana. By embedding this provision within the legal framework, the bill aims to discourage the perception of political manipulation surrounding appointed officials. This regulation would ensure that such appointments are seen as temporary and not a pathway to securing a longer-term political position.

Summary

Senate Bill 370, introduced by Senator Claitor, aims to amend election laws pertaining to the office of lieutenant governor in Louisiana. The bill specifically prohibits any individual who is appointed to fill a vacancy in this office, when the unexpired term exceeds one year, from being able to run for election to complete that term. This legislative change seeks to ensure that individuals appointed to the lieutenant governor position do not have the opportunity to leverage their appointed status for electoral advantage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB370 appears cautiously supportive, focusing on promoting fairness within the electoral process. Advocates of the bill suggest that it levels the playing field, ensuring that the appointed officials do not gain undue influence or benefit from their position. However, some critics may argue about the implications of limiting opportunities for capable individuals appointed to the role during transitional periods.

Contention

Despite its intended purpose, SB370 may face contention regarding its fairness and implementation. Critics may question whether the bill could discourage qualified candidates from accepting temporary appointments, knowing they cannot pursue the position directly following their term. The debate may also include discussions on whether similar restrictions should be applied to other appointed offices, raising broader questions around the accountability and electoral rights of appointed officials.