Louisiana Senate Bill SB447

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/12/10
• Engrossed: 5/4/10
• Refer: 5/5/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Enrolled: 6/16/10
• Chaptered: 6/25/10
• Passed: 6/25/10

Caption

Repeals requirement for establishment of certain high school student database. (8/15/10)

Impact

The repeal of the student database requirement could significantly impact how the state tracks student outcomes and plans after high school. Without this database, the ability to gather comprehensive data on students' post-graduate activities—including further education, employment statistics, and other pathways—will be compromised. This may hinder future assessments of educational effectiveness and adjustments to programs designed for students in Louisiana, as data-driven decision-making will be limited.

Summary

Senate Bill 447 aims to repeal the statutory requirement for the Louisiana Department of Education to create and maintain a database that tracks high school students' plans after graduation. The original intent behind this legislation was to monitor students' post-secondary transitions and aid in educational planning and resource allocation. However, SB447 seeks to eliminate this requirement, effectively removing an obligation for state educational agencies to maintain this specific data repository.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB447 appears to be mixed. Some stakeholders in the education system may view the repeal as a means to reduce bureaucratic overhead, allowing schools to allocate their resources more effectively without the burden of additional reporting requirements. Conversely, educators and advocates for student support services might express concern that eliminating this data requirement will reduce the state's ability to understand and respond to the needs of students transitioning out of the high school environment.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include concerns over the implications for data availability and educational accountability. Critics may argue that repealing the requirement diminishes the state’s ability to monitor educational progression and respond to students' needs post-graduation. Proponents of the bill, however, may argue for the necessity of alleviating schools from the responsibilities associated with maintaining such data, instead advocating for a more streamlined and focused approach to educational policy and student support.