Authorizes the granting of servitudes on state lands for development and production of hydrokinetic energy. (gov sig) (EG NO IMPACT See Note)
Impact
The legislation will significantly change how state lands can be utilized for energy production. Specifically, the bill allows for the granting of servitudes on state properties, including vacant lands and water bottoms, thereby enabling access for hydrokinetic energy projects. Additionally, it mandates that any servitude is contingent on obtaining and maintaining a hydro power license from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, ensuring that projects are compliant with federal regulations. This approach is intended to streamline the process of tapping into renewable energy resources while placing the ecological and regulatory framework in place to safeguard state interests.
Summary
Senate Bill 592, introduced by Senator Michot, authorizes the State Mineral and Energy Board to grant servitudes for the development and production of hydrokinetic energy on state-owned lands. This initiative aims to enhance renewable energy generation and promote cleaner energy sources within Louisiana, emphasizing the importance of utilizing the state's waterways for energy production. The bill supports the state's commitment to environmental sustainability and economic development by creating job opportunities associated with the renewable energy sector.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SB 592 appears to be positive, particularly from proponents of renewable energy. Advocates argue that the bill will foster innovation and investment in clean energy technologies, consequently leading to economic growth in Louisiana. However, some stakeholders may express concerns regarding environmental impacts and the practical implications of implementing hydrokinetic projects. Overall, the sentiment reflects an alignment with broader trends towards supporting renewable energy initiatives in state policy.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB 592 may relate to the balance between development and environmental protection. While the bill promotes hydrokinetic energy as a clean energy source, there could be debates on the ecological consequences of utilizing waterways for energy production. Critics might question whether sufficient regulatory measures are in place to prevent negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, concerns may arise regarding the equitable distribution of economic benefits from such initiatives, ensuring that local communities are also considered in the development process.
Authorizes the State Mineral and Energy Board to lease state lands for the development or production of alternate energy resources. (8/15/10) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF RV See Note)