Louisiana Senate Bill SB701

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/14/10
• Refer: 4/14/10
• Report Pass: 5/24/10
• Engrossed: 6/2/10
• Refer: 6/3/10
• Report Pass: 6/15/10
• Enrolled: 6/21/10
• Chaptered: 6/29/10
• Passed: 6/29/10

Caption

Provides relative to options available to certain high school dropouts pursuant to court order. (8/15/10)

Impact

The implementation of SB 701 will likely influence state laws related to dropout prevention and recovery strategies. By establishing a requirement for court-ordered compliance, the bill attempts to underscore the importance of continuous education and the potential consequences of leaving school early. The options provided in the bill encourage students to either reengage with traditional education systems or pursue alternative educational certifications, which may help to reduce the rates of high school dropouts within the state. This approach reflects a broader educational strategy aimed at increasing graduate rates and providing opportunities for youth.

Summary

Senate Bill 701 aims to provide structured options for high school dropouts in Louisiana who have been ordered by a court to comply with educational directives. The bill specifies that students under the age of eighteen must choose from three defined paths within one hundred twenty days of leaving school: they can reenroll in school with the goal of graduation, enroll in a high school equivalency diploma program, or enlist in the military while working towards earning a high school equivalency diploma during their service. This legislation seeks to offer a clear and supportive path for students who may otherwise be at risk of falling through the cracks of the education system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 701 appears to be generally positive, particularly among educational advocates and policymakers who recognize the importance of addressing dropout rates. However, there may be mixed feelings from various stakeholders regarding the enforcement of court orders. Supporters argue that providing structured options will motivate students to make positive educational choices, while critics may voice concerns about the potential stigma associated with court-ordered education compliance. The debate highlights differing perspectives on state intervention in student education.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise from the implications of legally mandating educational paths for students who are deemed truants. Opponents might argue that such measures could intrude upon personal freedoms and fail to consider individual circumstances that lead to a student's dropout. Additionally, questions may be raised about the adequacy of resources available for students choosing the equivalency diploma option, as well as the potential challenges of balancing educational mandates with personal autonomy. Overall, the bill aims to enhance educational support mechanisms while navigating these complex issues.