Louisiana Senate Bill SR78

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/12/10
• Refer: 5/12/10
• Report Pass: 6/3/10
• Passed: 6/4/10

Caption

Provides relative to testifying before Senate committees.

Impact

The primary impact of SR78 is the modification of existing legislative processes, specifically regarding how individuals engage with Senate committees. By mandating the notification of intent to testify and requiring sworn statements, the bill reinforces the integrity of the testimony process, which may lead to more accurate and accountable legislative hearings. This change could also potentially streamline the process, ensuring that committee members can more effectively allocate time for testimonies and manage proceedings. Overall, the resolution intends to improve the legislative process's transparency and reliability, significantly impacting how testimony is handled during committee meetings.

Summary

Senate Resolution 78 (SR78), sponsored by Senator Morrell, aims to amend and readopt Senate Rule 13.78(B) of the Rules of Order of the Senate concerning procedures related to testifying before Senate committees. The bill seeks to enhance the structure and accountability of testimony by requiring individuals who wish to testify to inform the committee chairman or secretary prior to the meeting. This change importantly emphasizes the need for a written sworn statement affirming the truthfulness of their testimony, effectively placing individuals under oath when they deliver their statements in committee hearings.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SR78 appears to be supportive, as it seeks to solidify the procedures under which testimonies are provided. The legislative debate likely reflects a consensus on enhancing the integrity of spoken testimonies in Senate hearings. Still, there may be concerns from stakeholders about the implications for accessibility, possibly making it more cumbersome for individuals to participate effectively if the process becomes overly formal or strict.

Contention

While the bill seems to have garnered support, potential points of contention could arise around the implications for who gets to testify and how accessible the process remains. Critics might argue that requiring sworn statements and notifications could unintentionally inhibit public participation, particularly from those who may not have the resources or knowledge to navigate these requirements. Overall, the resolution reflects an important shift in the procedural dynamics of Senate hearings, balancing the need for accountability with the vital component of public engagement.