Louisiana Senate Bill SR88

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/24/10
• Passed: 5/24/10

Caption

Requests the Louisiana Legislative Auditor to conduct a compliance audit and a performance audit of the district attorney's office in the 16th JD.

Impact

The resolution aims to ensure that the operations of the district attorney's office are not only compliant with existing laws but also efficient and effective in fulfilling its roles. The audits proposed are designed to detect potential misappropriation of public assets and enhance the understanding of operational efficiencies within the office, thus potentially leading to improvements in public trust and accountability.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 88, introduced by Senator Hebert, urges the Louisiana Legislative Auditor to conduct both a compliance audit and a performance audit of the district attorney's office in the Sixteenth Judicial District. The resolution arises from significant concerns raised during legislative discussions regarding the functioning and management of the district attorney's office. It emphasizes the necessity for elected office holders to adhere to state laws and maintain ethical standards in their administration.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR88 appears to lean towards a proactive approach to governance and oversight. Advocates for the resolution likely see it as a critical step toward strengthening the integrity of public institutions, ensuring that public resources are managed properly. However, there may also be concerns voiced by opponents regarding the implication of audits and oversight on the autonomy of district attorneys.

Contention

While SR88 is positioned as a tool for improved accountability, the resolution does not indicate any existing political friction. However, it lays the groundwork for future discussions about oversight and the potential need for reforms within the district attorney's office. This could lead to debates about who should have the authority to enforce compliance and the extent to which the district attorneys should be scrutinized.