Connecticut House Bill HB06444

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/11
• Refer: 2/23/11
• Report Pass: 3/8/11
• Refer: 3/18/11
• Report Pass: 3/24/11
• Engrossed: 4/13/11
• Report Pass: 4/14/11
• Chaptered: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/20/11
• Passed: 5/24/11

Caption

An Act Clarifying The Definition Of "emergency" And "major Disaster".

Impact

The passage of HB 06444 is expected to enhance the state's disaster response framework by allowing for better planning and resource allocation during emergencies. By clarifying these definitions, the bill facilitates a more structured approach for local governments in developing their civil preparedness plans. Local organizations will be better equipped to respond to various types of disasters, enhancing overall community resilience and safety.

Summary

House Bill 06444, also known as An Act Clarifying The Definition Of 'emergency' And 'major Disaster', aims to amend existing state statutes to create a clearer understanding of what constitutes an emergency and a major disaster. The bill provides definitions that align with federal standards and expands the scope of what can be classified as a major disaster, including a variety of natural and manmade events. This change is intended to ensure that local and state emergency management can more effectively coordinate resources and responses based on standardized definitions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 06444 has been largely supportive, with stakeholders acknowledging the importance of clearly defined terms in emergency management. Lawmakers, emergency responders, and community leaders expressed that the bill could streamline disaster declarations and funding processes. While there has been minimal contention, some discussions highlighted the need for training and resources to ensure local organizations can effectively implement the changes mandated by the bill.

Contention

Despite the overall support, there are concerns regarding the capacity of local organizations to meet the standards set forth in the bill. Some legislators have expressed worries about whether there will be adequate funding and training available to ensure these organizations can adapt to the new definitions and responsibilities. The bill’s requirement for municipalities to establish local organizations for civil preparedness raises questions about the feasibility and sustainability of such structures in smaller jurisdictions.