Connecticut House Bill HB06542

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Report Pass: 3/22/11
• Refer: 4/1/11
• Report Pass: 4/7/11
• Refer: 5/4/11
• Report Pass: 5/10/11

Caption

An Act Establishing A Pilot Program For The Development Of An Energy Efficient Economy.

Impact

This legislation represents a proactive approach to improving energy efficiency in governmental operations, setting a precedent for environmental accountability within state-managed facilities. It outlines duties for regular energy audits and the selection of contractors based on their capabilities and project experience, fostering a structured process for enhancing energy performance and encouraging sustainable practices. By creating more efficient public assets, the program could lead to substantial reductions in operational costs for the state and municipalities.

Summary

House Bill 6542 establishes a pilot program aimed at developing an energy-efficient economy specifically targeting state and municipal-owned buildings. The bill mandates that the Department of Public Works, in collaboration with other environmental departments, oversee a three-year program to implement energy-saving measures that are both cost-effective and beneficial. By adopting various technologies such as advanced lighting, HVAC systems, and renewable sources, the bill aims to significantly reduce energy consumption across public infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely positive, as it embodies a commitment to environmental stewardship and the prudent use of taxpayer dollars. Supporters emphasize its potential to produce lasting benefits through reduced operational costs and improved environmental performance. However, concerns may arise regarding the initial costs associated with implementing such measures and the administrative burden on public works departments.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the effectiveness of pilot programs in achieving their stated goals and the allocation of financial resources to implement these initiatives. While proponents argue that the bill supports state leadership in energy conservation, critics might question whether adequate oversight mechanisms will be in place to monitor the program's success and ensure transparency in the selection of contractors and implementation of projects.