Louisiana House Bill HB112

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/16/11

Caption

Provides relative to public school policies prohibiting the harassment, intimidation, and bullying of a student by another student

Impact

If enacted, HB 112 will have a significant impact on school district policies statewide. It mandates that local public school boards adopt and incorporate detailed anti-bullying policies into their student codes of conduct. Importantly, the bill eliminates the exceptions for certain parishes, thereby expanding the application of these protective measures across the state. This development could lead to more uniform policies against bullying and harassment in schools, promoting a more inclusive educational atmosphere.

Summary

House Bill 112 aims to strengthen public school policies regarding harassment, intimidation, and bullying among students. The bill amends existing laws to provide clearer definitions of these terms, focusing on behaviors that may be motivated by a student’s actual or perceived characteristics, including race, religion, gender identity, and various disabilities. This effort is part of a broader initiative to create a safer school environment for all students, emphasizing the importance of preventing bullying and harassment in educational settings.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 112 appears to be supportive of its intents but is nuanced by varying opinions on its implementation. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary step to ensure the well-being of students, enabling them to learn in a more secure environment. Critics, however, may express concerns regarding the practical application of these definitions and whether existing school resources are sufficient to enforce such policies effectively.

Contention

A notable point of contention relates to the application of the bill across previously exempt parishes. While proponents of the bill see removing these exemptions as a positive step toward comprehensive protection for all students, opponents may voice concerns about local governance and the specific needs of various communities. This conflict highlights the tension between establishing statewide standards for student safety and allowing local authorities the discretion to tailor policies to their unique circumstances.