Connecticut Senate Bill SB00336

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/12
• Refer: 3/1/12
• Report Pass: 3/15/12
• Refer: 3/23/12
• Report Pass: 3/29/12
• Refer: 4/10/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Negligent Hunting And Trespassing For Purposes Of Hunting, Trapping Or Fishing.

Impact

By categorizing negligent hunting as a class B misdemeanor with increased fines, the bill aims to deter instances of unsafe hunting practices. Additionally, it enhances the existing definitions of trespassing to cover hunting, trapping, and fishing without permission. This law would significantly impact individuals who engage in wildlife activities, imposing stricter consequences for violations and reflecting a heightened concern for safety in hunting practices.

Summary

SB00336, titled 'An Act Concerning Negligent Hunting and Trespassing for Purposes of Hunting, Trapping or Fishing,' introduces amendments to existing statutes regarding hunting and trespassing laws. The bill aims to address negligent hunting practices and enhance penalties for trespass-related offenses while hunting. Specifically, it redefines negligent hunting to include specific actions deemed irresponsible, such as hunting out of season and using firearms in a manner that endangers people or property.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00336 appears to be supportive among lawmakers focused on public safety and responsible hunting practices. Advocacy for wildlife conservation groups may also align with this legislation due to its intent to ensure safe hunting environments. However, there may still be voices of concern from hunting communities regarding the implications of increased penalties and the definitions of negligent hunting.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the potential perception that the bill could disproportionately penalize hunters for minor infractions. Critics might argue that the definitions of negligent activities are too broad and could lead to unfair charges against responsible hunters. This highlights an ongoing tension between conservation efforts and the rights of sportsmen, suggesting that additional dialogues may be necessary to address concerns from diverse stakeholder perspectives.