Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05396

Introduced
3/2/12  
Refer
3/2/12  
Report Pass
3/21/12  
Report Pass
3/21/12  
Refer
3/30/12  
Refer
3/30/12  
Report Pass
4/5/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning The State Fleet And Mileage, Fuel And Emission Standards.

Impact

The enactment of HB 05396 is anticipated to have a notable impact on state laws relating to environmental standards and transportation policies. By implementing these stricter regulations, the bill seeks to promote the use of clean energy vehicles within state operations, aligning with broader goals of sustainability and environmental responsibility. Additionally, the legislation encourages the adoption of technologies that could lead to innovations in the automotive sector specific to alternative fuel vehicles.

Summary

House Bill 05396 aims to establish stricter fuel and emission standards for the state vehicle fleet by mandating that a significant portion of vehicles purchased or leased by the state be alternative-fueled, hybrid electric, or plug-in electric vehicles. Specifically, the bill stipulates that at least 50% of all such vehicles must meet these criteria, progressing towards a requirement for 100% alternative-fueled vehicles by January 1, 2016. The intent of the bill is to enhance fuel efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint of state operations.

Sentiment

There appears to be a supportive sentiment towards HB 05396 among environmentally conscious legislators and advocacy groups who advocate for progressive transportation policies. Proponents argue the bill represents an essential step towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting public health by lowering air pollution levels. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the practicality of transitioning to a completely alternative-fueled fleet, especially regarding cost implications and the availability of suitable vehicles.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 05396 include debates about the feasibility of completely transitioning the state fleet by the targeted deadline. Critics argue that the original plans may not adequately account for the availability of the necessary alternative-fueled vehicles and the potential costs involved in such a transition. Moreover, exceptions are made for emergency and law enforcement vehicles, which may lead to discussions about equity and the balance of prioritizing ecological considerations against operational needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.