Louisiana House Bill HB596

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/28/11
• Refer: 5/2/11

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Veronica Clark, et al v. State of Louisiana DOTD"

Impact

The passage of HB 596 would provide immediate financial resources to settle the judgment in relation to the aforementioned lawsuit. By addressing the need for appropriating funds, the bill ensures that the state can fulfill its legal obligations and avoid potential further legal complications that could arise from non-payment. This action signifies the state's commitment to upholding judicial decisions and maintaining trust with its constituents by addressing claims made against state entities.

Summary

House Bill 596, introduced by Representative Foil, concerns the appropriation of funds from the Louisiana state general fund for the fiscal year 2011-2012. The bill specifically allocates the amount of $150,000, along with court costs of $784.76, to cover a consent judgment resulting from the lawsuit 'Veronica Clark, et al v. State of Louisiana DOTD'. This case involves the claims of the plaintiffs against the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) and pertains to damages following a legal dispute.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 596 appears to be procedural, focused mainly on the need for fiscal accountability and compliance with legal judgments. As it's primarily a financial appropriations measure, the sentiment is likely neutral among lawmakers, with emphasis on the necessity of funding to resolve outstanding legal matters rather than a contentious political debate. The act's straightforward nature makes it less susceptible to partisan divisions seen in other more complex legislative proposals.

Contention

Given the nature of HB 596 as a technical financial appropriation, points of contention are likely minimal but could arise around the implications of budgetary constraints. There may be discussions regarding the allocation of state funds, particularly in light of competing financial priorities within the state budget. Legislators may scrutinize whether the funds can be sourced without impacting other critical services or obligations of the state, leading to debates about budgeting and fiscal responsibility.