Connecticut House Bill HB05540

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/12
• Refer: 3/15/12
• Report Pass: 3/23/12
• Refer: 4/4/12
• Report Pass: 4/11/12
• Engrossed: 5/5/12
• Report Pass: 5/5/12
• Chaptered: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Concerning The Disposal Of Solid Waste At Out-of-state Land Disposal Facilities.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to have significant implications on state regulations regarding solid waste management. By establishing a structured process for adopting and amending the solid waste management plan, the legislation would enhance the state's ability to control the disposal of solid waste and ensure compliance with federal and state requirements. It also aims to encourage municipalities to prioritize waste reduction strategies, thereby fostering a culture of sustainability in waste management practices.

Summary

House Bill 5540 is an act concerning the disposal of solid waste at out-of-state land disposal facilities. The bill mandates that the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection adopt regulations for a state-wide solid waste management plan, incorporating municipal plans and establishing specific goals for waste management practices such as source reduction, recycling, and composting. This legislative measure aims to create a cohesive approach to solid waste disposal, considering the environmental impact and efficiency of land use.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 5540 appears to be positive, with a collective agreement on the necessity to improve solid waste management. Advocates see this bill as a proactive measure to address growing waste concerns and to safeguard environmental health. However, concerns might arise around compliance costs and the challenges municipalities could face implementing the new regulations, indicating that while support exists, there are nuanced apprehensions about practical execution.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the provision allowing disposal at out-of-state facilities, contingent on compliance with existing regulations. Some critics could interpret this as a potential loophole that undermines local waste management efforts. Additionally, there could be debates on the extent of authority granted to the Commissioner regarding waste priorities and the implications of state intervention in municipal waste management policies, raising questions about the balance of control between state and local governments.