Louisiana Senate Bill SR66

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/26/11
• Refer: 5/26/11

Caption

Provides for certain procedures relative to the passage of an appropriation bill when one-time money is appropriated for recurring expenses.

Impact

This resolution primarily impacts the legislative processes surrounding budgetary appropriations at the state level, particularly when one-time funds are involved in funding recurring expenses. The implementation of these rules is intended to provide a safeguard against the misuse of one-time funds, promoting fiscal responsibility within state government operations. By requiring a substantial consensus for such measures, proponents believe it will lead to more prudential financial management, preventing the potential pitfalls associated with spending one-time revenues on ongoing expenses.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 66 aims to establish specific procedures for the passage of appropriation bills that allocate one-time money for recurring expenses. The proposed rule necessitates that before any motion is made to finally pass such an appropriation bill, a separate motion must first be adopted with a two-thirds favorable vote from the members present. Additionally, the same voting requirement applies to floor amendments proposing to appropriate one-time money for ordinary recurring expenses, ensuring a higher threshold for approval in these financial decisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR66 appears largely supportive among those prioritizing financial stability and responsible budgeting. Advocates argue that this measure will enhance transparency and accountability in state spending, reducing the risk of funding shortfalls in future fiscal periods. However, there may exist some contention among legislators who view the stricter voting requirements as a hindrance to swift decision-making and flexibility in budgetary matters during urgent financial situations.

Contention

Notably, the requirement for a two-thirds majority could generate contention during budget discussions, particularly among those legislators who prefer a more straightforward procedural approach to appropriations. Critics might argue that such regulations could delay essential funding measures and create obstacles during economic emergencies, where rapid response could be critical. The debate on SR66 encapsulates broader concerns regarding the balance between fiscal prudence and the agility necessary for effective governance.