Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00114

Introduced
1/11/13  
Introduced
1/11/13  
Refer
1/11/13  
Refer
1/11/13  
Refer
2/15/13  
Refer
2/15/13  
Report Pass
3/12/13  
Report Pass
3/12/13  
Refer
3/21/13  
Refer
3/21/13  
Report Pass
3/27/13  
Report Pass
3/27/13  
Engrossed
4/18/13  
Engrossed
4/18/13  
Report Pass
4/19/13  
Report Pass
4/19/13  
Chaptered
5/20/13  
Chaptered
5/20/13  
Enrolled
5/22/13  
Enrolled
5/22/13  
Passed
5/28/13  

Caption

An Act Prohibiting Residential Landlords From Requiring Tenants To Pay Rent By Electronic Funds Transfer.

Impact

The bill is significant as it addresses the broader issue of tenant rights and the accessibility of payment methods in housing contracts. By preventing landlords from solely relying on electronic transfers, the legislation seeks to promote fairness and accommodate the varying financial situations of tenants. It creates a legal framework that ensures traditional payment methods remain viable options for residents, potentially impacting how rental agreements are structured in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 00114, also known as the Act Prohibiting Residential Landlords From Requiring Tenants To Pay Rent By Electronic Funds Transfer, is designed to safeguard tenants’ payment methods by prohibiting landlords from mandating electronic funds transfer (EFT) as the exclusive means for paying rent or security deposits. This legislation is aimed at ensuring flexibility in rental payment options, thus supporting tenants who may not have access to electronic payment methods or who prefer traditional methods such as checks or cash. The bill takes effect for any lease or rental agreement executed on or after October 1, 2013.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00114 is largely supportive among tenant advocacy groups, who view the legislation as a positive step towards protecting renters' rights. Proponents argue that it alleviates pressure on tenants who may struggle with digital payment methods due to lack of access or preference. However, there may be some opposition from landlords who prefer electronic payments for efficiency and tracking purposes. Overall, the bill is seen as a consumer-friendly measure that fosters inclusivity in housing transactions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential impact on landlords' operational practices, who may find it less convenient to manage varied payment methods. Concerns were raised that the legislation could open up avenues for non-payment or delays if traditional payment methods are not effectively managed. Additionally, the discussion may have sparked a debate about the role of technology in modernizing rent collection while balancing tenant rights and protections.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00268

An Act Requiring A Study Of Advance Rental Payments.

CT HB05156

An Act Requiring Notices Of Rent Increases.

CT HB05474

An Act Concerning Municipal Approvals For Housing Development, Fines For Violations Of Local Ordinances, Regulation Of Short-term Rentals, Rental Assistance Program Administration, Notices Of Rent Increases And The Housing Environmental Improvement Revolving Loan And Grant Fund.

CT SB00041

An Act Prohibiting State Agencies From Charging Service Fees For Payments Made By Certain Means.

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT SB00007

An Act Concerning Connecticut Paid Sick Days.

CT HB05089

An Act Concerning Funding For Fire Departments To Electronically Track Health Data.

CT SB00006

An Act Concerning Housing.

CT SB00199

An Act Requiring Online Prevention Education For Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Dealer Registration.

CT SB00146

An Act Concerning The Administration Of The Rental Assistance Program And Other Housing Voucher Programs.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.