Louisiana House Bill HR101

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/15/11
• Passed: 6/16/11

Caption

Recognizes Lieutenant Colonel William G. Mason upon his retirement from the La. Army National Guard

Impact

The resolution serves to officially document Lieutenant Colonel Mason's legacy, ensuring that his service is recognized by the state. By acknowledging the achievements of individuals like Mason, such commendatory resolutions can enhance community valorization of military service and encourage civic pride. However, since HR101 is not a legislative bill but a commendation, its direct impact on state law is negligible. Rather, it demonstrates the legislative body's respect and acknowledgment of military personnel's sacrifices and contributions.

Summary

House Resolution 101 is a commendatory resolution recognizing and celebrating the retirement of Lieutenant Colonel William G. Mason from the Louisiana Army National Guard. The resolution honors his nearly three decades of service, highlighting his significant contributions and the numerous leadership roles he held throughout his military career. It expresses the appreciation of the House of Representatives for his dedication and the exemplary spirit he displayed while serving both the state and the nation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR101 is overwhelmingly positive. Members of the legislature and the community appreciate the recognition of military service and the contributions made by individuals like Lieutenant Colonel Mason. The resolution reflects a collective gratitude for those who have served in the armed forces, promoting a narrative that recognizes the importance of military service within the state and fosters a sense of honor toward its veterans.

Contention

Since HR101 is primarily a resolution of recognition rather than a piece of legislation that would face substantial debate, there are minimal points of contention surrounding it. Some may argue that while such resolutions are worthwhile, they do not address current needs or issues facing military personnel or veterans. The absence of direct legislative action in regards to benefits or services for veterans could be seen as a point for discussion among advocates for veteran rights. However, the resolution itself is largely uncontroversial.