Louisiana House Bill HCR192

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/20/11
• Engrossed: 6/21/11

Caption

Provides relative to trailer safety devices

Impact

The passage of HCR192 would lead to significant changes within the state's vehicle safety regulations, particularly affecting how state departments handle trailer attachments. By advocating for solid safety devices over chains, the bill promotes a higher standard of safety that could influence vehicle safety practices across the state. Additionally, the resolution calls on state agencies to adopt better safety equipment, which may lead to an increase in budgeting for safety innovations, thus shaping future transportation policies in Louisiana.

Summary

HCR192 urges state departments, including the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, the Department of Transportation and Development, and the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, to equip trailers weighing over 10,000 pounds with solid safety devices for attachment to towing vehicles. This bill is a response to the recognition of safety issues pertaining to trailer detachments that can occur when traditional safety chains are used. It reflects an intent to enhance safety on Louisiana's highways and potentially reduce accidents involving state property. By adopting more reliable fastening methods, the resolution aims to protect both the public and state assets.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HCR192 is likely positive, especially among safety advocates and families affected by trailer accidents. The bill highlights a proactive approach to public safety that aligns with community desires for safer road conditions. However, some opposition could arise from concerns about the cost of implementing new safety devices or resistance to changes in established practices. Additionally, discussions during the legislative process have underscored the need for comprehensive evaluations of safety equipment to ensure efficacy and compliance with existing regulations.

Contention

While HCR192 primarily serves as an urging resolution rather than a statutory change, its implications suggest discussions regarding costs and implementation challenges. Prior legislation related to trailer safety has faced critiques — for instance, previous efforts to mandate safety devices were not favorably reported. Ensuring that the proposed devices meet rigorous safety standards and are economically feasible for state departments is likely to be a point of contention as stakeholders evaluate the logistics of rolling out the proposed changes across various state departments.