Louisiana Senate Bill SR146

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/22/11
• Passed: 6/22/11

Caption

Requests DHH to not include certified public expenditures of certain public hospitals as funds generated for state Fiscal Year 2010-2011.

Impact

The resolution seeks to maximize the potential upper payment limit payments to non-state, non-rural public hospitals for a specified period by advising DHH to not count certain certified public expenditures as revenue. This could significantly affect state funding dynamics and the fiscal health of these hospitals, which often operate under tight financial circumstances. The ability of hospitals to receive these funds is crucial for their continued operation and for providing uncompensated care to patients who cannot afford medical services.

Summary

Senate Resolution 146, sponsored by Senator Heitmeier, urges the Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH) not to include certain certified public expenditures of public hospitals in the funds generated for the state fiscal year 2010-2011. The resolution arises from prior legislation that mandates non-state, non-rural public hospitals to certify matching funds for Title XIX claim payments and report on the certified public expenditures exceeding appropriated amounts. It highlights the financial implications for public hospitals and their ability to receive upper payment limit payments if certain conditions are met regarding the classification of public expenditures.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SR146 reflect a sentiment focused on financial prudence and the need for clarity in funding allocation for public hospitals. Supporters of the resolution emphasize the need for ensuring that hospitals can adequately seize the funds available to them without the constraints of cumbersome regulations. However, there might be concerns about the long-term impacts of such resolutions on the overall budgetary framework and the services provided to the communities that these hospitals serve.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the implications of this resolution on local hospitals’ operations. While it aims to optimize funding, the broader effects on state financial procedures and accountability could be debated. Stakeholders might express differing views on how not counting certain expenditures could influence the financial monitoring of hospitals, leading to discussions about transparency and equitable access to state resources.