Louisiana House Bill HB64

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/28/12
• Engrossed: 4/4/12
• Refer: 4/9/12
• Report Pass: 5/8/12
• Enrolled: 5/15/12
• Chaptered: 5/22/12
• Passed: 5/22/12

Caption

Prohibits the false personation of a firefighter (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 64 will directly affect R.S. 14:112.1, which governs offenses related to impersonating law enforcement personnel. By including firefighters in this statute, the bill reinforces the protection of these essential public servants against impersonation, closing a legal loophole that previously only included peace officers. This change ensures that individuals impersonating firefighters will face the same legal consequences as those impersonating police officers, thereby increasing accountability and deterring such behaviors.

Summary

House Bill 64 aims to amend existing state laws regarding false personation by extending the definitions and penalties associated with impersonating peace officers to include firefighters. The bill seeks to provide clarity on who qualifies as a firefighter and specifically defines various roles within law enforcement and emergency services. By doing so, it aims to strengthen protections against individuals attempting to assume these roles without authority, thereby enhancing community safety and trust in first responders.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 64 appears to be positive, particularly among legislators who recognize the importance of protecting first responders and maintaining the integrity of law enforcement. Supporters argue that this law enhances public safety and underscores the state's commitment to supporting both peace officers and firefighters. There has been unanimous support during the voting process, indicating a collective agreement on the necessity of such measures within the legislature.

Contention

While specific points of contention were not heavily publicized during the discussions of HB 64, concerns may arise in the broader conversation about the implications of expanding legal definitions within law enforcement. Some advocates for civil liberties may argue about the need for careful consideration of how laws are enforced in practice. However, the strong bipartisan support suggests that any opposition was minimal or effectively managed during the legislative process.