Louisiana House Bill HB103

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/5/12
• Engrossed: 4/18/12
• Refer: 4/19/12
• Report Pass: 5/15/12
• Enrolled: 5/22/12
• Chaptered: 5/31/12
• Passed: 5/31/12

Caption

Authorizes an automobile expense allowance for the East Feliciana, West Feliciana, and St. Landry Parish clerk of court (EN +$57,000 LF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 103 represents a significant shift in the administrative powers of the clerks of court within the mentioned parishes. By allowing clerks to bypass the local governing authority's consent, the bill facilitates quicker procurement of vehicles necessary for their official duties, potentially improving their administrative efficiency. Furthermore, the establishment of the automobile expense allowance ensures that clerks have financial support for vehicle-related costs without imposing extra expenses on state or local government budgets.

Summary

House Bill 103 aims to amend specific regulations regarding the clerks of court for East Feliciana, West Feliciana, and St. Landry Parishes. The bill exempts these clerks from needing consent from the local governing authority to purchase automobiles for their official duties. Additionally, it introduces an automobile expense allowance, enabling these clerks to receive a portion of their salary designated for automobile-related expenses, contingent on maintaining adequate automobile insurance coverage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 103 appears to be predominantly positive, especially among the clerks and their supporters who view the bill as a practical solution to streamline operations. The allowance for the expense and exemption from consent reflects a legislative recognition of the unique needs of these parish clerks. However, there may be concerns from local governance advocates who could perceive the bill as diminishing local authority and oversight.

Contention

Key points of contention may arise around the implications of removing the consent requirement for vehicle purchases. Critics might argue that this could lead to unregulated spending by clerks, while supporters likely counter that the bill includes safeguards through required insurance. The balance between enhancing the autonomy of clerks and maintaining local governance oversight is central to the debate on HB 103, revealing broader discussions on the scope of local versus state control.