Louisiana House Bill HB115

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state in the matter of "Willie Norris, et al v. the Department of Transportation and Development"

Impact

The passage of HB 115 directly affects the state's budget for the fiscal year 2012-2013, as it draws from the general fund of Louisiana. By acknowledging this financial responsibility, the bill aims to ensure the state fulfills its obligations resulting from legal judgments, thus potentially influencing the state's reputation for handling litigation claims effectively. The funding is essential to resolve outstanding debts and legal responsibilities that may arise from disputes involving the Department of Transportation.

Summary

House Bill 115 is an appropriation bill proposed by Representative James that allocates funds for the payment of a consent judgment in the case of Willie Norris, et al. v. the Department of Transportation and Development. The bill specifically designates $100,000 for Willie Norris and $75,000 for Stephen B. Bonner, both awarded in the legal proceedings regarding claims against the state. This allocation is intended to settle the state's liabilities arising from the court's decision in favor of the plaintiffs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 115 appears to be practical and focused on compliance with legal rulings. While there may not be overt public or legislative contention noted in the available discussions, the nature of appropriation bills usually leads to thorough scrutiny regarding the use of public funds. Generally, the sentiment is supportive among those who see the necessity of honoring legal judgments, while concerns about the implications on the budget may resonate with fiscal conservatives.

Contention

One notable point of contention that may arise from such appropriation bills is the ongoing challenge of budget allocation versus the demands of legal settlements. As more cases arise and result in judgments against the state, there is a risk that increasingly large settlements could strain the state budget. The conversation surrounding HB 115 could therefore center on the balancing act of ensuring justice for aggrieved parties while maintaining fiscal responsibility to taxpayers and state funds.